Product comparison · 2 solar inverters

Salicru EQX2 20002-T vs Salicru EQX2 6002-HSX

47specifications compared
17differ
30identical
8known for one product only

Key differences

The Salicru EQX2 20002-T has 15.4 kVA more output power capacity (max) than the Salicru EQX2 6002-HSX (22 kVA vs 6.6 kVA). The Salicru EQX2 20002-T has 0.5 V more output operation voltage (min) than the Salicru EQX2 6002-HSX (195.5 V vs 195 V). The Salicru EQX2 20002-T has 22,400 W more maximum input power (DC) than the Salicru EQX2 6002-HSX (32000 W vs 9600 W). MPP voltage range: 160 - 1000 V on the Salicru EQX2 20002-T, 100 - 550 V on the Salicru EQX2 6002-HSX.

Output power capacity (max)
- EQX2 20002-T:22 kVA
- EQX2 6002-HSX:6.6 kVA
Output operation voltage (min)
- EQX2 20002-T:195.5 V
- EQX2 6002-HSX:195 V
MPP voltage range
- EQX2 20002-T:160 - 1000 V
- EQX2 6002-HSX:100 - 550 V
Maximum input power (DC)
- EQX2 20002-T:32000 W
- EQX2 6002-HSX:9600 W
Maximum power
- EQX2 20002-T:20000 W
- EQX2 6002-HSX:6000 W
DC input voltage
- EQX2 20002-T:1100 V
- EQX2 6002-HSX:600 V
Network voltage
- EQX2 20002-T:400 V
- EQX2 6002-HSX:230 V
Output current
- EQX2 20002-T:29 A
- EQX2 6002-HSX:26.1 A

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of EQX2 20002-T, EQX2 6002-HSX
55 specifications	A Salicru EQX2 20002-T View product	B Salicru EQX2 6002-HSX View product
Features16 differ
Output power capacity (max)Differs	22 kVA	6.6 kVA
Output operation voltage (min)Differs	195.5 V	195 V
Number of phasesKnown for one	3	Unknown — not stated by the source
MPP voltage rangeDiffers	160 - 1000 V	100 - 550 V
Maximum input power (DC)Differs	32000 W	9600 W
Maximum powerDiffers	20000 W	6000 W
DC input voltageDiffers	1100 V	600 V
Network voltageDiffers	400 V	230 V
Output currentDiffers	29 A	26.1 A
Short-circuit current per MPPT (max)Differs	40 A	20 A
Starting voltageDiffers	180 V	80 V
Number of maximum power point tracking (MPPT)Differs	2	1
Number of strings per MPPTDiffers	2	1
Maximum input current per MPPTDiffers	30 A	15 A
EfficiencyDiffers	98.6%	97.6%
Efficiency (EU)Differs	98.2%	97%
Efficiency (MPPT)Known for one	99.9%	Unknown — not stated by the source
MaterialKnown for one	Silicon carbide (SiC)	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffers	Certificate EN 61000-6-2/3, IEC 62109-1/2 / EN 61000-6-2/3, IEC EN UNE 61683, IEC EN UNE 60068-2-1/2/14/30, UNE EN 62116:2014, IEC 61727:2004, UNE 217002:2020, UNE 217001:2020, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001	EN 61000-6-2/3, IEC 62109-IEC EN UNE 616831/2 / EN 61000-6-2/3, IEC EN UNE 60068-1/2/14/30, UNE EN 62116:2014, IEC 61727:2004, UNE 217002:2020, UNE 217001:2020, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001
Number of power levelsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7
Designidentical
Housing materialKnown for one	Aluminium	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cooling typeKnown for one	Passive	Unknown — not stated by the source
Overvoltage categoryKnown for one	CAT II	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	29 kg	26 kg
Ports & interfacesidentical
Photovoltaic (PV) inputKnown for one	8	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More solar inverter comparisons

All solar inverter comparisons