All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 smart card readers

Cherry ST-2000U smart card reader Indoor USB 2.0 White vs Trust DNIe smart card reader Indoor USB USB 2.0 Black

Add a product
  • 11specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 3identical
  • 22known for one product only

Key differences

The Cherry ST-2000U smart card reader Indoor USB 2.0 White has 0.65 m more cable length than the Trust DNIe smart card reader Indoor USB USB 2.0 Black (1.75 m vs 1.1 m). The Cherry ST-2000U smart card reader Indoor USB 2.0 White has 109.8 mm more package width than the Trust DNIe smart card reader Indoor USB USB 2.0 Black (195 mm vs 85.2 mm). The Cherry ST-2000U smart card reader Indoor USB 2.0 White has 127.5 mm more package depth than the Trust DNIe smart card reader Indoor USB USB 2.0 Black (154 mm vs 26.5 mm). Compatible products: PC/SC, EMV 2000 Level 1, CCID on the Cherry ST-2000U smart card reader Indoor USB 2.0 White, DNIe, SmartCards on the Trust DNIe smart card reader Indoor USB USB 2.0 Black. Product colour: White on the Cherry ST-2000U smart card reader Indoor USB 2.0 White, Black on the Trust DNIe smart card reader Indoor USB USB 2.0 Black.

  • Product colour
    • White
    • Black
  • Cable length
    • 1.75 m
    • 1.1 m
  • Package width
    • 195 mm
    • 85.2 mm
  • Package depth
    • 154 mm
    • 26.5 mm
  • Package height
    • 67 mm
    • 65 mm
  • Package weight
    • 600 g
    • 690 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
33 specifications
A

Cherry

ST-2000U smart card reader Indoor USB 2.0 White

Model ST-2000U

View product
B

Trust

DNIe smart card reader Indoor USB USB 2.0 Black

Model DNIe

View product
Features1 differ
Secure PIN entryKnown for oneYes
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYes
Mean cycles between failures (MCBF)Known for one100000
Compatible productsDiffersPC/SC, EMV 2000 Level 1, CCIDDNIe, SmartCards
Design2 differ
Placement supportedIndoorIndoor
Product colourDiffersWhiteBlack
Cable lengthDiffers1.75 m1.1 m
LED indicatorsKnown for oneYes
Ports & interfacesidentical
InterfaceUSB 2.0USB 2.0
Supported protocolsKnown for oneT=0, T=1, S=8, S=9, S=10
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one1
Poweridentical
Standby currentKnown for one100 mA
Power sourceKnown for oneUSB
USB poweredKnown for oneYes
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 50 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 60 °C
System requirements1 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersYesWindows 10 Education, Windows 10 Education x64, Windows 10 Enterprise, Windows 10 Enterprise x64, Windows 10 Home, Windows 10 Home x64, Windows 10 Pro, Windows 10 Pro x64, Windows 7 Enterprise, Windows 7 Enterprise x64, Windows 7 Home Basic, Windows 7 Home Basic x64, Windows 7 Home Premium, Windows
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneYes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneYes
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one150 mm
HeightKnown for one92 mm
DepthKnown for one55 mm
WeightKnown for one252 g
Sustainabilityidentical
CertificationKnown for oneFCC, GS, CE, UL, EMV 2000 l.1
Packaging data4 differ
Quick installation guideYesYes
Package widthDiffers195 mm85.2 mm
Package depthDiffers154 mm26.5 mm
Package heightDiffers67 mm65 mm
Package weightDiffers600 g690 g
Package typeKnown for oneBox
Logistics dataidentical
Products per palletKnown for one24 pc(s)
Master (outer) cases per palletKnown for one12 pc(s)
Other featuresidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneWindows 98/ME/2000/XP/XP64/Vista/Vista64 Linux MAC OS

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More smart card reader comparisons

All smart card reader comparisons