Product comparison · 2 scanners

Canon LM24 600 x 600 DPI Black, White vs Kodak Alaris S5210 ADF scanner

14specifications compared
9differ
5identical
39known for one product only

Key differences

The Canon LM24 600 x 600 DPI Black, White has 242 mm more width than the Kodak Alaris S5210 ADF scanner (935 mm vs 693 mm). The Kodak Alaris S5210 ADF scanner has 677 mm more depth than the Canon LM24 600 x 600 DPI Black, White (823 mm vs 146 mm). The Kodak Alaris S5210 ADF scanner has 1,177 mm more height than the Canon LM24 600 x 600 DPI Black, White (1308 mm vs 131 mm). Product colour: Black, White on the Canon LM24 600 x 600 DPI Black, White, Grey, White on the Kodak Alaris S5210 ADF scanner. Display: LED on the Canon LM24 600 x 600 DPI Black, White, LCD on the Kodak Alaris S5210 ADF scanner.

Product colour
- LM24 600 x 600 DPI Black, White:Black, White
- S5210 ADF scanner:Grey, White
Display
- LM24 600 x 600 DPI Black, White:LED
- S5210 ADF scanner:LCD
Display diagonal
- LM24 600 x 600 DPI Black, White:7.62 cm (3")
- S5210 ADF scanner:19.1 cm (7.5")
Light source
- LM24 600 x 600 DPI Black, White:LED
- S5210 ADF scanner:White LED (2x)
USB version
- LM24 600 x 600 DPI Black, White:2.0
- S5210 ADF scanner:3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Width
- LM24 600 x 600 DPI Black, White:935 mm
- S5210 ADF scanner:693 mm
Depth
- LM24 600 x 600 DPI Black, White:146 mm
- S5210 ADF scanner:823 mm
Height
- LM24 600 x 600 DPI Black, White:131 mm
- S5210 ADF scanner:1308 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of LM24, S5210
53 specifications	A Canon LM24 600 x 600 DPI Black, White Model LM24 View product	B Kodak Alaris S5210 ADF scanner Model S5210 View product
Scanningidentical
Maximum scan sizeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	305 x 10160 mm
Colour scanningKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Input colour depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	48 bit
Output colour depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	24 bit
Output greyscale depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8 bit
Greyscale levelsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	256
ADF scan speed (b/w, A3)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	210 ppm
Design3 differ
Scanner typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ADF scanner
Product colourDiffers	Black, White	Grey, White
DisplayDiffers	LED	LCD
Display diagonalDiffers	7.62 cm (3")	19.1 cm (7.5")
Colour displayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Control typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Buttons, Touch
Performance1 differ
Sensor typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CCD
Light sourceDiffers	LED	White LED (2x)
Scan file formatsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	BMP, JPEG, XLSX, DOCX, TIFF, PDF, PNG, RTF
Barcode readerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Scan driversKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ISIS, Kofax VRS, TWAIN, WIA
Scanning noise levelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	62 dB
Scanner smart software featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Correction & auto-cropping
Scan toKnown for one	PC, USB, Cloud	Unknown — not stated by the source
Input capacityidentical
Auto document feeder (ADF) input capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	750 sheets
Paper handlingidentical
Maximum ISO A-series paper sizeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	A3
Maximum scan widthKnown for one	61 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB versionDiffers	2.0	3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Networkidentical
Supported network protocolsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	DHCP, TCP/IP
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	240 W
Power supply typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	AC
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.5 W
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50 - 60 Hz
Power consumption (PowerSave)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	23.7 W
Input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 - 240 V
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	935 mm	693 mm
DepthDiffers	146 mm	823 mm
HeightDiffers	131 mm	1308 mm
WeightDiffers	5.28 kg	196 kg
Folded heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	106.7 cm
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ENERGY STAR
System requirementsidentical
Minimum RAMKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8192 MB
Minimum processorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Intel i5 - Gen 12
Server operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2022
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Windows 10, Windows 10 Education, Windows 10 Education x64, Windows 10 Enterprise, Windows 10 Enterprise x64, Windows 10 Home, Windows 10 Home x64, Windows 10 IOT Core, Windows 10 IoT Enterprise, Windows 10 Pro, Windows 10 Pro x64, Windows 10 x64, Windows 11, Windows 11 Enterprise, Windows 11 Enterp
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	15 - 35 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	15 - 80%
Other featuresidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	RCM, cTUVus, ICES, CE, GS mark, VCCI, Norma Oficial Mexicana (NOM), Federal Communications Commission (FCC), UKCA
Scan media weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	25 - 433 g/m²
Control panelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Technical detailsidentical
Linear (1D) barcodes supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Code 128, Code 3 of 9, EAN-13, EAN-8, Interleaved 2 of 5, PDF417, UPC-A, UPC-E

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More scanner comparisons

All scanner comparisons