Product comparison · 2 raid controllers

GIGABYTE CRAO338 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 12 Gbit/s vs Lenovo 46C9010 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 6 Gbit/s

Add a product
  • 7specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 2identical
  • 19known for one product only

Key differences

The Lenovo 46C9010 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 6 Gbit/s has 2 more external mini-SAS ports than the GIGABYTE CRAO338 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 12 Gbit/s (4 vs 2). The GIGABYTE CRAO338 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 12 Gbit/s has 6 Gbit/s more data transfer rate than the Lenovo 46C9010 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 6 Gbit/s (12 Gbit/s vs 6 Gbit/s). The Lenovo 46C9010 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 6 Gbit/s has 57.2 mm more depth than the GIGABYTE CRAO338 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 12 Gbit/s (168 mm vs 110.8 mm). Supported storage drive interfaces: SAS on the GIGABYTE CRAO338 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 12 Gbit/s, SAS, Serial ATA on the Lenovo 46C9010 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 6 Gbit/s.

  • Supported storage drive interfaces
    • CRAO338 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 12 Gbit/s:SAS
    • 46C9010 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 6 Gbit/s:SAS, Serial ATA
  • External mini-SAS ports
    • CRAO338 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 12 Gbit/s:2
    • 46C9010 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 6 Gbit/s:4
  • Data transfer rate
    • CRAO338 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 12 Gbit/s:12 Gbit/s
    • 46C9010 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 6 Gbit/s:6 Gbit/s
  • Depth
    • CRAO338 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 12 Gbit/s:110.8 mm
    • 46C9010 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 6 Gbit/s:168 mm
  • Height
    • CRAO338 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 12 Gbit/s:78 mm
    • 46C9010 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 6 Gbit/s:17 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of CRAO338, 46C9010
26 specifications
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Supported storage drive interfacesDiffersSASSAS, Serial ATA
External mini-SAS portsDiffers24
Internal SAS portsKnown for one8Unknown — not stated by the source
Internal SATA ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Performance1 differ
Data transfer rateDiffers12 Gbit/s6 Gbit/s
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUL cUL IEC60950 EMC FCC TUV CE VCCI BSMI C-tick KC
Compatible productsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcex3500 M4, x3550 M4, x3630 M4, x3650 M4, x3650 M4 BD, x3650 M4 HD, x3750 M4, x3750 M4, x3850 X6/x3950 X6, x3850 X6/x3950 X6, nx360 M4
RAID levelsKnown for one0, 1, 1E, 10Unknown — not stated by the source
Form factorKnown for oneMezzanine ModuleUnknown — not stated by the source
ChipsetKnown for oneBroadcom SAS3008Unknown — not stated by the source
Processoridentical
Built-in processorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Processor familyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLSI
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8 - 93%
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source69 mm
DepthDiffers110.8 mm168 mm
HeightDiffers78 mm17 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source220 g
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source143 x 238 x 51 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source315 g
Other featuresidentical
PCI Card form factorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceHalf-height (low-profile)
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one84733080Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More raid controller comparisons

All raid controller comparisons