ATEN CL5800 rack console vs StarTech.com Rackmount KVM Console - Single Port VGA KVM with

Key differences

The StarTech.com Rackmount KVM Console - Single Port VGA KVM with has 10 - 80% more operating relative humidity (H-H) than the ATEN CL5800 rack console (10 - 80% vs 0 - 80%). The ATEN CL5800 rack console has 9.9 W more power consumption (typical) than the StarTech.com Rackmount KVM Console - Single Port VGA KVM with (22.9 W vs 13 W). The StarTech.com Rackmount KVM Console - Single Port VGA KVM with has 0.5 A more input current than the ATEN CL5800 rack console (1.5 A vs 1 A). Display diagonal: 48.3 cm (19") on the ATEN CL5800 rack console, 43.2 cm (17") on the StarTech.com Rackmount KVM Console - Single Port VGA KVM with. Pixel pitch: 0.294 x 0.294 mm on the ATEN CL5800 rack console, 0.264 x 0.264 mm on the StarTech.com Rackmount KVM Console - Single Port VGA KVM with.

• Display diagonal
  • CL5800 rack console:48.3 cm (19")
  • Rackmount KVM Console - Single Port VGA KVM with:43.2 cm (17")
• Pixel pitch
  • CL5800 rack console:0.294 x 0.294 mm
  • Rackmount KVM Console - Single Port VGA KVM with:0.264 x 0.264 mm
• Material
  • CL5800 rack console:Metal
  • Rackmount KVM Console - Single Port VGA KVM with:Steel
• LED indicators
  • CL5800 rack console:Yes
  • Rackmount KVM Console - Single Port VGA KVM with:Power, Status
• Operating relative humidity (H-H)
  • CL5800 rack console:0 - 80%
  • Rackmount KVM Console - Single Port VGA KVM with:10 - 80%
• Keyboard port type
  • CL5800 rack console:USB, PS/2
  • Rackmount KVM Console - Single Port VGA KVM with:USB
• Mouse port type
  • CL5800 rack console:USB, PS/2
  • Rackmount KVM Console - Single Port VGA KVM with:USB
• Power consumption (typical)
  • CL5800 rack console:22.9 W
  • Rackmount KVM Console - Single Port VGA KVM with:13 W