Product comparison · 2 powerline network adapters

FRITZ!Powerline 1260E WLAN Set vs TP-Link TL-PA7019 KIT

24specifications compared
14differ
10identical
16known for one product only

Key differences

The FRITZ!Powerline 1260E WLAN Set has 200 Mbit/s more maximum data transfer rate than the TP-Link TL-PA7019 KIT (1200 Mbit/s vs 1000 Mbit/s). The FRITZ!Powerline 1260E WLAN Set has 10 V more AC input voltage than the TP-Link TL-PA7019 KIT (230 V vs 220 V). The FRITZ!Powerline 1260E WLAN Set has 2 mm more width than the TP-Link TL-PA7019 KIT (67 mm vs 65 mm). Only the FRITZ!Powerline 1260E WLAN Set has Wi-Fi. Only the FRITZ!Powerline 1260E WLAN Set has built-in power socket.

Maximum data transfer rate
- FRITZ!Powerline 1260E WLAN Set:1200 Mbit/s
- TL-PA7019 KIT:1000 Mbit/s
Wi-Fi
- FRITZ!Powerline 1260E WLAN Set:Yes
- TL-PA7019 KIT:No
Power plug
- FRITZ!Powerline 1260E WLAN Set:Type F
- TL-PA7019 KIT:Type C
Built-in power socket
- FRITZ!Powerline 1260E WLAN Set:Yes
- TL-PA7019 KIT:No
AC input voltage
- FRITZ!Powerline 1260E WLAN Set:230 V
- TL-PA7019 KIT:220 V
Width
- FRITZ!Powerline 1260E WLAN Set:67 mm
- TL-PA7019 KIT:65 mm
Depth
- FRITZ!Powerline 1260E WLAN Set:32 mm
- TL-PA7019 KIT:52 mm
Height
- FRITZ!Powerline 1260E WLAN Set:132 mm
- TL-PA7019 KIT:28.5 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of FRITZ!Powerline 1260E WLAN Set, TL-PA7019 KIT
40 specifications	A FRITZ! FRITZ!Powerline 1260E WLAN Set View product	B TP-Link TL-PA7019 KIT View product
Performance5 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers	1200 Mbit/s	1000 Mbit/s
Wi-FiDiffers	Yes	No
Networking standardsDiffers	IEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11h, IEEE 802.11i	IEEE 1901, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3u
Power plugDiffers	Type F	Type C
Built-in power socketDiffers	Yes	No
ModulationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	OFDM
Maximum operating distanceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	300 m
Copper ethernet cabling technologyKnown for one	10BASE-T, 100BASE-T, 1000BASE-T	Unknown — not stated by the source
Wi-Fi standardsKnown for one	802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g	Unknown — not stated by the source
WLAN data transfer rates supportedKnown for one	866 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.3 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.5 W
AC input voltageDiffers	230 V	220 V
Designidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for one	LAN, Power	Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirements1 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffers	Windows 10, Windows 10 Education, Windows 10 Education x64, Windows 10 Enterprise, Windows 10 Enterprise x64, Windows 10 Home, Windows 10 Home x64, Windows 10 IOT Core, Windows 10 Pro, Windows 10 Pro x64, Windows 7, Windows 7 Enterprise, Windows 7 Enterprise x64, Windows 7 Home Basic, Windows 7 Home	Yes
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Mac compatibilityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-40 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 90%
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	67 mm	65 mm
DepthDiffers	32 mm	52 mm
HeightDiffers	132 mm	28.5 mm
WeightKnown for one	200 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	184 mm	190 mm
Package depthDiffers	132 mm	136 mm
Package heightDiffers	110 mm	100 mm
Package weightDiffers	700 g	400 g
Package typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Box

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More powerline network adapter comparisons

All powerline network adapter comparisons