Product comparison · 2 powerline network adapters

D-Link Hybrid Whole Home Wi-Fi System vs Zyxel PLA5405 v2

Add a product
  • 22specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 9identical
  • 12known for one product only

Key differences

The D-Link Hybrid Whole Home Wi-Fi System has 100 Mbit/s more maximum data transfer rate than the Zyxel PLA5405 v2 (1300 Mbit/s vs 1200 Mbit/s). The D-Link Hybrid Whole Home Wi-Fi System has 2 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the Zyxel PLA5405 v2 (3 vs 1). The D-Link Hybrid Whole Home Wi-Fi System has 8 W more power consumption (typical) than the Zyxel PLA5405 v2 (12 W vs 4 W). Only the D-Link Hybrid Whole Home Wi-Fi System has Wi-Fi. Security algorithms: WPA, WPA2 on the D-Link Hybrid Whole Home Wi-Fi System, 128-bit AES on the Zyxel PLA5405 v2.

  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • Hybrid Whole Home Wi-Fi System:1300 Mbit/s
    • PLA5405 v2:1200 Mbit/s
  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • Hybrid Whole Home Wi-Fi System:3
    • PLA5405 v2:1
  • Wi-Fi
    • Hybrid Whole Home Wi-Fi System:Yes
    • PLA5405 v2:No
  • Security algorithms
    • Hybrid Whole Home Wi-Fi System:WPA, WPA2
    • PLA5405 v2:128-bit AES
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • Hybrid Whole Home Wi-Fi System:12 W
    • PLA5405 v2:4 W
  • LED indicators
    • Hybrid Whole Home Wi-Fi System:LAN, Power, Signal strength
    • PLA5405 v2:Yes
  • Product colour
    • Hybrid Whole Home Wi-Fi System:Grey, White
    • PLA5405 v2:White
  • Certification
    • Hybrid Whole Home Wi-Fi System:FCC, CE , UL, CE/LVD, WEEE
    • PLA5405 v2:CE, FCC, BSMI CE-LVD, IEC

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of COVR-P2502, PLA5405 v2
34 specifications
Performance4 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers1300 Mbit/s1200 Mbit/s
Ethernet LANYesYes
Ethernet LAN interface typeGigabit EthernetGigabit Ethernet
Ethernet LAN data rates10,100,1000 Mbit/s10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers31
Wi-FiDiffersYesNo
Top Wi-Fi standardKnown for oneWi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)Unknown — not stated by the source
Wi-Fi standardsKnown for one802.11a, Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), 802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)Unknown — not stated by the source
WLAN data transfer rates supportedKnown for one300,866,1300 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Networking standardsKnown for oneIEEE 1901, IEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11ac, IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11n, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3i, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3xUnknown — not stated by the source
Security algorithmsDiffersWPA, WPA2128-bit AES
Quality of Service (QoS) supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
PowerLine standardKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceHomePlug AV2
Maximum operating distanceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source300 m
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs12 W4 W
AC input voltage100 - 240 V100 - 240 V
AC input frequency50 - 60 Hz50 - 60 Hz
Power consumption (standby)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.5 W
Design3 differ
Antenna typeKnown for oneExternalUnknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsDiffersLAN, Power, Signal strengthYes
Product colourDiffersGrey, WhiteWhite
CertificationDiffersFCC, CE , UL, CE/LVD, WEEECE, FCC, BSMI CE-LVD, IEC
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)0 - 40 °C0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs-20 - 65 °C-30 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)10 - 90%10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Differs5 - 95%10 - 95%
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers79.7 mm90 mm
DepthDiffers47 mm60 mm
HeightDiffers140 mm27 mm
WeightKnown for one280 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneRoHSUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per pack2 pc(s)2 pc(s)
Quick installation guideYesYes
Cables includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLAN (RJ-45)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More powerline network adapter comparisons

All powerline network adapter comparisons