All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 pos printers

Epson T20IV-L 203 x 203 DPI Wired Direct thermal POS printer vs Epson TM-T82IV 203 x 203 DPI Wired Thermal POS printer

Add a product
  • 22specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 14identical
  • 12known for one product only

Key differences

The Epson T20IV-L 203 x 203 DPI Wired Direct thermal POS printer has 0.05 cm more maximum roll diameter than the Epson TM-T82IV 203 x 203 DPI Wired Thermal POS printer (8 cm vs 7.95 cm). The Epson TM-T82IV 203 x 203 DPI Wired Thermal POS printer has 0.5 million cuts more autocutter durability than the Epson T20IV-L 203 x 203 DPI Wired Direct thermal POS printer (2 million cuts vs 1.5 million cuts). The Epson T20IV-L 203 x 203 DPI Wired Direct thermal POS printer has 4.1 W more power consumption (printing) than the Epson TM-T82IV 203 x 203 DPI Wired Thermal POS printer (31.3 W vs 27.2 W). Print technology: Direct thermal on the Epson T20IV-L 203 x 203 DPI Wired Direct thermal POS printer, Thermal on the Epson TM-T82IV 203 x 203 DPI Wired Thermal POS printer.

  • Print technology
    • Direct thermal
    • Thermal
  • Maximum roll diameter
    • 8 cm
    • 7.95 cm
  • Autocutter durability
    • 1.5 million cuts
    • 2 million cuts
  • Power consumption (printing)
    • 31.3 W
    • 27.2 W
  • Width
    • 140 mm
    • 149 mm
  • Height
    • 137 mm
    • 140 mm
  • Weight
    • 1.5 kg
    • 1.7 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
34 specifications
A

Epson

T20IV-L 203 x 203 DPI Wired Direct thermal POS printer

Model T20IV-L

View product
B

Epson

TM-T82IV 203 x 203 DPI Wired Thermal POS printer

Model TM-T82IV

View product
Printing1 differ
Print technologyDiffersDirect thermalThermal
TypePOS printerPOS printer
Maximum resolution203 x 203 DPI203 x 203 DPI
Print speed250 mm/sec250 mm/sec
Character sizeKnown for one1.25 x 3 mm
Paper handling1 differ
Maximum roll diameterDiffers8 cm7.95 cm
Printing media thicknessKnown for one53 - 75 µm
Ports & interfacesidentical
Connectivity technologyWiredWired
USB portYesYes
USB connectorKnown for oneUSB Type-B
Serial interfaceKnown for oneYes
Serial interface typeKnown for oneRS-232
Networkidentical
Ethernet LANNoNo
Wi-FiNoNo
Features2 differ
Built-in barcodesDiffersCODABAR (NW-7), Code 39, Code 93, EAN13, EAN8, GS1 DataBar, GS1-128, ITF, UPC-A, UPC-EUPC-A, UPC-E, EAN8, EAN13, Code 39, Code 93, Code 128 (A/B/C), Code 129-Auto, ITF, GS1-128, GS1 DataBar
Mean time between failures (MTBF)360000 h360000 h
CutterYesYes
Autocutter durabilityDiffers1.5 million cuts2 million cuts
Sound pressure level (printing)Known for one55 dB
Print head lifeKnown for one150 km
Receive bufferKnown for one128 KB
Designidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
Power1 differ
Power source typeACAC
Power consumption (printing)Differs31.3 W27.2 W
AC input voltage100 - 240 V100 - 240 V
AC input frequency50/60 Hz50/60 Hz
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneYes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneMac OS 12.4, Mac OS 13.1, Mac OS X 10.10 Yosemite, Mac OS X 10.11 El Capitan, Mac OS X 10.12 Sierra, Mac OS X 10.13 High Sierra, Mac OS X 10.14 Mojave, Mac OS X 10.15 Catalina, Mac OS X 10.15.3 Catalina, Mac OS X 11.0 Big Sur, Mac OS X 12.0 Monterey, Mac OS X 13.0 Ventura
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers140 mm149 mm
Depth192 mm192 mm
HeightDiffers137 mm140 mm
WeightDiffers1.5 kg1.7 kg
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one10 - 90%
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one5 - 45 °C

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More pos printer comparisons

All pos printer comparisons