Product comparison · 2 pos monitors

iiyama T2252MSC-B1 POS monitor vs Viewsonic XF1740 17” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation

16specifications compared
12differ
4identical
31known for one product only

Key differences

The iiyama T2252MSC-B1 POS monitor has 40 cd/m² more display brightness than the Viewsonic XF1740 17” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation (250 cd/m² vs 210 cd/m²). The iiyama T2252MSC-B1 POS monitor has 2 ms more response time than the Viewsonic XF1740 17” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation (7 ms vs 5 ms). The iiyama T2252MSC-B1 POS monitor has 8° more viewing angle, horizontal than the Viewsonic XF1740 17” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation (178° vs 170°). Display diagonal: 54.6 cm (21.5") on the iiyama T2252MSC-B1 POS monitor, 43.2 cm (17") on the Viewsonic XF1740 17” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation. Display resolution: 1920 x 1080 pixels on the iiyama T2252MSC-B1 POS monitor, 1280 x 1024 pixels on the Viewsonic XF1740 17” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation.

Display diagonal
- T2252MSC-B1 POS monitor:54.6 cm (21.5")
- XF1740 17” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation:43.2 cm (17")
Display resolution
- T2252MSC-B1 POS monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
- XF1740 17” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation:1280 x 1024 pixels
HD type
- T2252MSC-B1 POS monitor:Full HD
- XF1740 17” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation:SXGA
Display brightness
- T2252MSC-B1 POS monitor:250 cd/m²
- XF1740 17” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation:210 cd/m²
Native aspect ratio
- T2252MSC-B1 POS monitor:16:9
- XF1740 17” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation:5:4
Pixel pitch
- T2252MSC-B1 POS monitor:0.248 x 0.248 mm
- XF1740 17” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation:0.26 x 0.26 mm
Response time
- T2252MSC-B1 POS monitor:7 ms
- XF1740 17” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation:5 ms
Viewing angle, horizontal
- T2252MSC-B1 POS monitor:178°
- XF1740 17” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation:170°

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of T2252MSC-B1, XF1740
47 specifications	A iiyama T2252MSC-B1 POS monitor Model T2252MSC-B1 View product	B Viewsonic XF1740 17” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation Model XF1740 View product
Display9 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	54.6 cm (21.5")	43.2 cm (17")
Display resolutionDiffers	1920 x 1080 pixels	1280 x 1024 pixels
HD typeDiffers	Full HD	SXGA
Display brightnessDiffers	250 cd/m²	210 cd/m²
Touchscreen typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Projected Capacitive (PCAP)
Effective viewing areaKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	337.92 x 270.34 mm
Native aspect ratioDiffers	16:9	5:4
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.248 x 0.248 mm	0.26 x 0.26 mm
Response timeDiffers	7 ms	5 ms
Surface hardnessKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7H
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	178°	170°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	178°	160°
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Known for one	5000000:1	Unknown — not stated by the source
LED backlightKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Panel typeKnown for one	IPS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Features1 differ
VESA mountingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	MacOS
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30000 h
Windows operating systems supportedDiffers	Windows 10 Education, Windows 10 Education x64, Windows 10 Enterprise, Windows 10 Enterprise x64, Windows 10 Home, Windows 10 Home x64, Windows 10 Pro, Windows 10 Pro x64, Windows 7 Enterprise, Windows 7 Enterprise x64, Windows 7 Home Basic, Windows 7 Home Basic x64, Windows 7 Home Premium, Windows	Yes
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
InterfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	DisplayPort + HDMI + VGA + USB Type-B
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Poweridentical
Power source typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	DC
AC adapter input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 - 240 V
AC adapter output currentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4 A
AC adapter output voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	12 V
Weight & dimensionsidentical
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	48 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	324 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.3 kg
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	390.4 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	140 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	420 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.72 kg
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	470 mm
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs	10 - 80%	5 - 90%
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	5 - 35 °C	0 - 50 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	5 - 85%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Pallet gross heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	180 cm
Pallet gross lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 cm
Pallet gross widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	120 cm
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 pc(s)
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CB, CE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), RoHS
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for one	CE, TÜV-Bauart, cULus, CU, EPEAT Silver	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More pos monitor comparisons

All pos monitor comparisons