Product comparison · 2 portable air conditioners

Sogo AIR-SS-1291 portable air conditioner vs Whirlpool PACB29CO portable air conditioner Black

13specifications compared
7differ
6identical
23known for one product only

Key differences

The Sogo AIR-SS-1291 portable air conditioner has 3,000 BTU/h more cooling capacity (max) than the Whirlpool PACB29CO portable air conditioner Black (12000 BTU/h vs 9000 BTU/h). The Whirlpool PACB29CO portable air conditioner Black has 5 m² more suitable for room area up to than the Sogo AIR-SS-1291 portable air conditioner (30 m² vs 25 m²). The Whirlpool PACB29CO portable air conditioner Black has 78 mm more width than the Sogo AIR-SS-1291 portable air conditioner (448 mm vs 370 mm). Product colour: White on the Sogo AIR-SS-1291 portable air conditioner, Black on the Whirlpool PACB29CO portable air conditioner Black.

Cooling capacity (max)
- AIR-SS-1291 portable air conditioner:12000 BTU/h
- PACB29CO portable air conditioner Black:9000 BTU/h
Suitable for room area up to
- AIR-SS-1291 portable air conditioner:25 m²
- PACB29CO portable air conditioner Black:30 m²
Product colour
- AIR-SS-1291 portable air conditioner:White
- PACB29CO portable air conditioner Black:Black
Width
- AIR-SS-1291 portable air conditioner:370 mm
- PACB29CO portable air conditioner Black:448 mm
Depth
- AIR-SS-1291 portable air conditioner:345 mm
- PACB29CO portable air conditioner Black:400 mm
Height
- AIR-SS-1291 portable air conditioner:722 mm
- PACB29CO portable air conditioner Black:744 mm
Weight
- AIR-SS-1291 portable air conditioner:28.5 kg
- PACB29CO portable air conditioner Black:34 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of AIR-SS-1291, PACB29CO
36 specifications	A Sogo AIR-SS-1291 portable air conditioner Model AIR-SS-1291 View product	B Whirlpool PACB29CO portable air conditioner Black Model PACB29CO View product
Features2 differ
Cooling capacity (max)Differs	12000 BTU/h	9000 BTU/h
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.6
Dehumidifier functionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Sound power levelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	64 dB
Suitable for room area up toDiffers	25 m²	30 m²
Air filterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Filter typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	HEPA
Remotely operatedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Global warming potentialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3
Cooling temperature rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	21 - 32 °C
Number of speedsKnown for one	3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dehumidifying capacityKnown for one	1.3 l/h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Noise levelKnown for one	64 dB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Airflow (high speed)Known for one	350 m³/h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Castor wheelsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of wheelsKnown for one	4 wheel(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
International Protection (IP) codeKnown for one	IP20	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	220-240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50 Hz
CurrentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	6.5 A
Connected loadKnown for one	1340 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design load (cooling)Known for one	3.5 kW	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	White	Black
Display typeKnown for one	LED	Unknown — not stated by the source
Control typeKnown for one	Touch	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	370 mm	448 mm
DepthDiffers	345 mm	400 mm
HeightDiffers	722 mm	744 mm
WeightDiffers	28.5 kg	34 kg
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	38.5 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable air conditioner comparisons

All portable air conditioner comparisons