Product comparison · 2 portable air conditioners

De’Longhi PAC N90.B vs De’Longhi PAC T100 ECO

8specifications compared
8differ
0identical
31known for one product only

Key differences

The De’Longhi PAC N90.B has 1,045 BTU/h more cooling capacity (max) than the De’Longhi PAC T100 ECO (9045 BTU/h vs 8000 BTU/h). The De’Longhi PAC T100 ECO has 0.29 l/h more dehumidifying capacity than the De’Longhi PAC N90.B (1.25 l/h vs 0.96 l/h). The De’Longhi PAC T100 ECO has 3 dB more noise level than the De’Longhi PAC N90.B (47 dB vs 44 dB).

Cooling capacity (max)
- PAC N90.B:9045 BTU/h
- PAC T100 ECO:8000 BTU/h
Dehumidifying capacity
- PAC N90.B:0.96 l/h
- PAC T100 ECO:1.25 l/h
Noise level
- PAC N90.B:44 dB
- PAC T100 ECO:47 dB
Weight
- PAC N90.B:30 kg
- PAC T100 ECO:33 kg
Package width
- PAC N90.B:475 mm
- PAC T100 ECO:580 mm
Package depth
- PAC N90.B:450 mm
- PAC T100 ECO:630 mm
Package height
- PAC N90.B:870 mm
- PAC T100 ECO:1060 mm
Package weight
- PAC N90.B:33 kg
- PAC T100 ECO:45.4 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of PAC N90.B, PAC T100 ECO
39 specifications	A De’Longhi PAC N90.B View product	B De’Longhi PAC T100 ECO View product
Features3 differ
Air conditioner functionsKnown for one	Cooling, Dehumidifying	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cooling capacity (max)Differs	9045 BTU/h	8000 BTU/h
Cooling capacity in watts (max)Known for one	2650 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)Known for one	2.62	Unknown — not stated by the source
Built-in fanKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of speedsKnown for one	3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dehumidifying capacityDiffers	0.96 l/h	1.25 l/h
Noise levelDiffers	44 dB	47 dB
Airflow (low speed)Known for one	250 m³/h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Airflow (medium speed)Known for one	310 m³/h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Airflow (high speed)Known for one	350 m³/h	Unknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Hose lengthKnown for one	1.2 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Hose diameterKnown for one	13 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Air filterKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
TimerKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Timer typeKnown for one	Digital	Unknown — not stated by the source
Timer duration (maximum)Known for one	12 h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Remotely operatedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Castor wheelsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Handle(s)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
TechnologyKnown for one	Air - air	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Energy efficiency class (cooling)Known for one	A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy efficiency class (heating)Known for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Connected loadKnown for one	1010 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Annual energy consumption (cooling)Known for one	505 kWh	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one	220-240 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input frequencyKnown for one	50 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Built-in displayKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display typeKnown for one	LED	Unknown — not stated by the source
Product colourKnown for one	Grey	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions5 differ
WidthKnown for one	449 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	395 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	750 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers	30 kg	33 kg
Package widthDiffers	475 mm	580 mm
Package depthDiffers	450 mm	630 mm
Package heightDiffers	870 mm	1060 mm
Package weightDiffers	33 kg	45.4 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable air conditioner comparisons

All portable air conditioner comparisons