Product comparison · 2 portable air conditioners

MEDION MD 37732 vs TCL P12P-KHF14B portable air conditioner

Add a product
  • 12specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 4identical
  • 25known for one product only

Key differences

The TCL P12P-KHF14B portable air conditioner has 3,000 BTU/h more cooling capacity (max) than the MEDION MD 37732 (12000 BTU/h vs 9000 BTU/h). The TCL P12P-KHF14B portable air conditioner has 1 more speeds than the MEDION MD 37732 (3 vs 2). The TCL P12P-KHF14B portable air conditioner has 43 mm more width than the MEDION MD 37732 (358 mm vs 315 mm). Air conditioner functions: Cooling, Dehumidifying, Fan on the MEDION MD 37732, Cooling, Heating, Ventilating on the TCL P12P-KHF14B portable air conditioner. Refrigerating medium: R290 on the MEDION MD 37732, R32 on the TCL P12P-KHF14B portable air conditioner.

  • Cooling capacity (max)
    • MD 37732:9000 BTU/h
    • P12P-KHF14B portable air conditioner:12000 BTU/h
  • Number of speeds
    • MD 37732:2
    • P12P-KHF14B portable air conditioner:3
  • Refrigerating medium
    • MD 37732:R290
    • P12P-KHF14B portable air conditioner:R32
  • Width
    • MD 37732:315 mm
    • P12P-KHF14B portable air conditioner:358 mm
  • Depth
    • MD 37732:310 mm
    • P12P-KHF14B portable air conditioner:419 mm
  • Height
    • MD 37732:700 mm
    • P12P-KHF14B portable air conditioner:688 mm
  • Weight
    • MD 37732:22.5 kg
    • P12P-KHF14B portable air conditioner:26.2 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of MD 37732, P12P-KHF14B
37 specifications
Features4 differ
TypeMonobloc mobile air conditionerMonobloc mobile air conditioner
Air conditioner functionsDiffersCooling, Dehumidifying, FanCooling, Heating, Ventilating
Comfort sleeping modeYesYes
Cooling capacity (max)Differs9000 BTU/h12000 BTU/h
Number of speedsDiffers23
Refrigerating mediumDiffersR290R32
TimerYesYes
Timer duration (maximum)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source24 h
Auto-restartKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)Known for one2.6Unknown — not stated by the source
Water tank capacityKnown for one0.65 LUnknown — not stated by the source
Dehumidifying capacityKnown for one1 l/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Noise levelKnown for one65 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Airflow (medium speed)Known for one330 m³/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Suitable for room area up toKnown for one32 m²Unknown — not stated by the source
Air filterKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Timer typeKnown for oneDigitalUnknown — not stated by the source
Voice controlKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Connected loadKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1400 W
AC input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source115 V
AC input frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source60 Hz
CurrentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12.7 A
Energy efficiency class (cooling)Known for oneAUnknown — not stated by the source
Design load (cooling)Known for one2.6 kWUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Built-in displayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Display typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLED
Product colourBlackBlack
Control typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceTouch, Wireless
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers315 mm358 mm
DepthDiffers310 mm419 mm
HeightDiffers700 mm688 mm
WeightDiffers22.5 kg26.2 kg
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source39600 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source46000 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source86500 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source29.7 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Remote control includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable air conditioner comparisons

All portable air conditioner comparisons