Product comparison · 2 portable air conditioners

MEDION MD 37732 vs TCL P09F4CSW1K portable air conditioner

Add a product
  • 13specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 5identical
  • 25known for one product only

Key differences

The MEDION MD 37732 has 129 BTU/h more cooling capacity (max) than the TCL P09F4CSW1K portable air conditioner (9000 BTU/h vs 8871 BTU/h). The MEDION MD 37732 has 10 m² more suitable for room area up to than the TCL P09F4CSW1K portable air conditioner (32 m² vs 22 m²). The MEDION MD 37732 has 35 mm more width than the TCL P09F4CSW1K portable air conditioner (315 mm vs 280 mm). Air conditioner functions: Cooling, Dehumidifying, Fan on the MEDION MD 37732, Cooling on the TCL P09F4CSW1K portable air conditioner. Product colour: Black on the MEDION MD 37732, White on the TCL P09F4CSW1K portable air conditioner.

  • Air conditioner functions
    • MD 37732:Cooling, Dehumidifying, Fan
    • P09F4CSW1K portable air conditioner:Cooling
  • Cooling capacity (max)
    • MD 37732:9000 BTU/h
    • P09F4CSW1K portable air conditioner:8871 BTU/h
  • Suitable for room area up to
    • MD 37732:32 m²
    • P09F4CSW1K portable air conditioner:22 m²
  • Product colour
    • MD 37732:Black
    • P09F4CSW1K portable air conditioner:White
  • Width
    • MD 37732:315 mm
    • P09F4CSW1K portable air conditioner:280 mm
  • Depth
    • MD 37732:310 mm
    • P09F4CSW1K portable air conditioner:290 mm
  • Height
    • MD 37732:700 mm
    • P09F4CSW1K portable air conditioner:675 mm
  • Weight
    • MD 37732:22.5 kg
    • P09F4CSW1K portable air conditioner:21 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of MD 37732, P09F4CSW1K
38 specifications
Features3 differ
Air conditioner functionsDiffersCooling, Dehumidifying, FanCooling
Cooling capacity (max)Differs9000 BTU/h8871 BTU/h
Cooling capacity in watts (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2600 W
Dehumidifier functionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Wi-FiKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Suitable for room area up toDiffers32 m²22 m²
Suitable for room volume up toKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source54 m³
Filter typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceHEPA
Washable filterKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Global warming potentialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3
Comfort sleeping modeKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)Known for one2.6Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of speedsKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Water tank capacityKnown for one0.65 LUnknown — not stated by the source
Dehumidifying capacityKnown for one1 l/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Airflow (medium speed)Known for one330 m³/hUnknown — not stated by the source
TimerKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Timer typeKnown for oneDigitalUnknown — not stated by the source
Voice controlKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Energy efficiency class (heating)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceA
AC input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source220-240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 Hz
Design load (cooling)Known for one2.6 kWUnknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersBlackWhite
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers315 mm280 mm
DepthDiffers310 mm290 mm
HeightDiffers700 mm675 mm
WeightDiffers22.5 kg21 kg
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source337 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source328 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source877 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source24 kg
Technical detailsidentical
Warranty periodKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 year(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable air conditioner comparisons

All portable air conditioner comparisons