Product comparison · 2 portable air conditioners

MEDION MD 37732 vs TCL P07F4CSW1K portable air conditioner White

13specifications compared
9differ
4identical
20known for one product only

Key differences

The MEDION MD 37732 has 2,000 BTU/h more cooling capacity (max) than the TCL P07F4CSW1K portable air conditioner White (9000 BTU/h vs 7000 BTU/h). The MEDION MD 37732 has 0.5417 l/h more dehumidifying capacity than the TCL P07F4CSW1K portable air conditioner White (1 l/h vs 0.4583 l/h). The MEDION MD 37732 has 15 m² more suitable for room area up to than the TCL P07F4CSW1K portable air conditioner White (32 m² vs 17 m²). Air conditioner functions: Cooling, Dehumidifying, Fan on the MEDION MD 37732, Cooling, Fan on the TCL P07F4CSW1K portable air conditioner White. Product colour: Black on the MEDION MD 37732, White on the TCL P07F4CSW1K portable air conditioner White.

Air conditioner functions
- MD 37732:Cooling, Dehumidifying, Fan
- P07F4CSW1K portable air conditioner White:Cooling, Fan
Cooling capacity (max)
- MD 37732:9000 BTU/h
- P07F4CSW1K portable air conditioner White:7000 BTU/h
Dehumidifying capacity
- MD 37732:1 l/h
- P07F4CSW1K portable air conditioner White:0.4583 l/h
Suitable for room area up to
- MD 37732:32 m²
- P07F4CSW1K portable air conditioner White:17 m²
Product colour
- MD 37732:Black
- P07F4CSW1K portable air conditioner White:White
Width
- MD 37732:315 mm
- P07F4CSW1K portable air conditioner White:280 mm
Depth
- MD 37732:310 mm
- P07F4CSW1K portable air conditioner White:290 mm
Height
- MD 37732:700 mm
- P07F4CSW1K portable air conditioner White:675 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of MD 37732, P07F4CSW1K
33 specifications	A MEDION MD 37732 View product	B TCL P07F4CSW1K portable air conditioner White Model P07F4CSW1K View product
Features4 differ
TypeKnown for one	Monobloc mobile air conditioner	Unknown — not stated by the source
Air conditioner functionsDiffers	Cooling, Dehumidifying, Fan	Cooling, Fan
Comfort sleeping modeKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cooling capacity (max)Differs	9000 BTU/h	7000 BTU/h
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)Known for one	2.6	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of speedsKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Water tank capacityKnown for one	0.65 L	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dehumidifying capacityDiffers	1 l/h	0.4583 l/h
Noise levelKnown for one	65 dB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Airflow (medium speed)Known for one	330 m³/h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Suitable for room area up toDiffers	32 m²	17 m²
Air filter	Yes	Yes
Refrigerating medium	R290	R290
Timer	Yes	Yes
Timer typeKnown for one	Digital	Unknown — not stated by the source
Voice controlKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Fan speedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	320 - 260 RPM
Suitable for room volume up toKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	42.5 m³
Filter typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	HEPA
Remotely operatedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Global warming potentialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3
Poweridentical
Energy efficiency class (cooling)	A	A
Design load (cooling)Known for one	2.6 kW	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Black	White
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	315 mm	280 mm
DepthDiffers	310 mm	290 mm
HeightDiffers	700 mm	675 mm
WeightDiffers	22.5 kg	20 kg
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	337 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	328 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	877 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	23 kg
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	18 - 35 °C

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable air conditioner comparisons

All portable air conditioner comparisons