Product comparison · 2 portable air conditioners

MEDION MD 37732 vs Sogo AIR-SS-21085 portable air conditioner

Add a product
  • 9specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 1identical
  • 26known for one product only

Key differences

The Sogo AIR-SS-21085 portable air conditioner has 1 more speeds than the MEDION MD 37732 (3 vs 2). The Sogo AIR-SS-21085 portable air conditioner has 0.05 L more water tank capacity than the MEDION MD 37732 (0.7 L vs 0.65 L). The MEDION MD 37732 has 120 mm more width than the Sogo AIR-SS-21085 portable air conditioner (315 mm vs 195 mm). Air conditioner functions: Cooling, Dehumidifying, Fan on the MEDION MD 37732, Cooling on the Sogo AIR-SS-21085 portable air conditioner. Product colour: Black on the MEDION MD 37732, White on the Sogo AIR-SS-21085 portable air conditioner.

  • Air conditioner functions
    • MD 37732:Cooling, Dehumidifying, Fan
    • AIR-SS-21085 portable air conditioner:Cooling
  • Number of speeds
    • MD 37732:2
    • AIR-SS-21085 portable air conditioner:3
  • Water tank capacity
    • MD 37732:0.65 L
    • AIR-SS-21085 portable air conditioner:0.7 L
  • Product colour
    • MD 37732:Black
    • AIR-SS-21085 portable air conditioner:White
  • Width
    • MD 37732:315 mm
    • AIR-SS-21085 portable air conditioner:195 mm
  • Depth
    • MD 37732:310 mm
    • AIR-SS-21085 portable air conditioner:195 mm
  • Height
    • MD 37732:700 mm
    • AIR-SS-21085 portable air conditioner:190 mm
  • Weight
    • MD 37732:22.5 kg
    • AIR-SS-21085 portable air conditioner:900 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of MD 37732, AIR-SS-21085
35 specifications
Features3 differ
Air conditioner functionsDiffersCooling, Dehumidifying, FanCooling
Comfort sleeping modeKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling capacity (max)Known for one9000 BTU/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)Known for one2.6Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of speedsDiffers23
Water tank capacityDiffers0.65 L0.7 L
Dehumidifying capacityKnown for one1 l/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Noise levelKnown for one65 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Airflow (medium speed)Known for one330 m³/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Suitable for room area up toKnown for one32 m²Unknown — not stated by the source
Air filterKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Refrigerating mediumKnown for oneR290Unknown — not stated by the source
TimerKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Timer typeKnown for oneDigitalUnknown — not stated by the source
Voice controlKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Variable powerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Poweridentical
Energy efficiency class (cooling)Known for oneAUnknown — not stated by the source
Design load (cooling)Known for one2.6 kWUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100 - 240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 - 60 Hz
PowerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7 W
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersBlackWhite
Housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePolyvinyl chloride (PVC)
Control typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceButtons
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers315 mm195 mm
DepthDiffers310 mm195 mm
HeightDiffers700 mm190 mm
WeightDiffers22.5 kg900 g
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source210 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source210 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source200 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.06 kg
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE, RoHS
Warranty periodKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3 year(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable air conditioner comparisons

All portable air conditioner comparisons