Product comparison · 2 portable air conditioners

Hisense AP1022HW1GD portable air conditioner vs TCL P09F3CSW1K portable air conditioner White

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 1identical
  • 19known for one product only

Key differences

The Hisense AP1022HW1GD portable air conditioner has 1,000 BTU/h more cooling capacity (max) than the TCL P09F3CSW1K portable air conditioner White (10000 BTU/h vs 9000 BTU/h). The Hisense AP1022HW1GD portable air conditioner has 29.1 m² more suitable for room area up to than the TCL P09F3CSW1K portable air conditioner White (51.1 m² vs 22 m²). The Hisense AP1022HW1GD portable air conditioner has 84 mm more width than the TCL P09F3CSW1K portable air conditioner White (442 mm vs 358 mm). Only the TCL P09F3CSW1K portable air conditioner White has timer. Air conditioner functions: Cooling, Dehumidifying, Fan, Heating on the Hisense AP1022HW1GD portable air conditioner, Cooling, Fan on the TCL P09F3CSW1K portable air conditioner White.

  • Cooling capacity (max)
    • AP1022HW1GD portable air conditioner:10000 BTU/h
    • P09F3CSW1K portable air conditioner White:9000 BTU/h
  • Suitable for room area up to
    • AP1022HW1GD portable air conditioner:51.1 m²
    • P09F3CSW1K portable air conditioner White:22 m²
  • Timer
    • AP1022HW1GD portable air conditioner:No
    • P09F3CSW1K portable air conditioner White:Yes
  • Product colour
    • AP1022HW1GD portable air conditioner:Black
    • P09F3CSW1K portable air conditioner White:White
  • Width
    • AP1022HW1GD portable air conditioner:442 mm
    • P09F3CSW1K portable air conditioner White:358 mm
  • Depth
    • AP1022HW1GD portable air conditioner:373 mm
    • P09F3CSW1K portable air conditioner White:419 mm
  • Height
    • AP1022HW1GD portable air conditioner:718 mm
    • P09F3CSW1K portable air conditioner White:688 mm
  • Weight
    • AP1022HW1GD portable air conditioner:36.3 kg
    • P09F3CSW1K portable air conditioner White:26 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of AP1022HW1GD, P09F3CSW1K
29 specifications
Features4 differ
TypeKnown for oneMonobloc mobile air conditionerUnknown — not stated by the source
Air conditioner functionsDiffersCooling, Dehumidifying, Fan, HeatingCooling, Fan
Comfort sleeping modeKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling capacity (max)Differs10000 BTU/h9000 BTU/h
Number of speedsKnown for one3Unknown — not stated by the source
Sound pressure level (min)Known for one50 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Sound pressure level (max)Known for one53 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Noise levelKnown for one53 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Suitable for room area up toDiffers51.1 m²22 m²
Washable filterKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Refrigerating mediumKnown for oneR32Unknown — not stated by the source
TimerDiffersNoYes
Castor wheelsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Suitable for room volume up toKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source55 m³
Remotely operatedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Cooling temperature rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source18 - 35 °C
Design1 differ
Built-in displayYesYes
Display typeKnown for oneLEDUnknown — not stated by the source
Product colourDiffersBlackWhite
Control typeKnown for oneButtonsUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers442 mm358 mm
DepthDiffers373 mm419 mm
HeightDiffers718 mm688 mm
WeightDiffers36.3 kg26 kg
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source396 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source460 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source865 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 kg
Poweridentical
Energy efficiency class (cooling)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceA+

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable air conditioner comparisons

All portable air conditioner comparisons