Product comparison · 2 portable air conditioners

Haier AM12AA1GAA portable air conditioner vs Whirlpool PACB29CO portable air conditioner Black

Add a product
  • 9specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 5identical
  • 28known for one product only

Key differences

The Haier AM12AA1GAA portable air conditioner has 0.01 more cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W) than the Whirlpool PACB29CO portable air conditioner Black (2.61 vs 2.6). The Whirlpool PACB29CO portable air conditioner Black has 6 kg more weight than the Haier AM12AA1GAA portable air conditioner (34 kg vs 28 kg). Air conditioner functions: Cooling, Dehumidifying, Fan, Heating on the Haier AM12AA1GAA portable air conditioner, Cooling, Dehumidifying on the Whirlpool PACB29CO portable air conditioner Black. Product colour: White on the Haier AM12AA1GAA portable air conditioner, Black on the Whirlpool PACB29CO portable air conditioner Black.

  • Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)
    • AM12AA1GAA portable air conditioner:2.61
    • PACB29CO portable air conditioner Black:2.6
  • Product colour
    • AM12AA1GAA portable air conditioner:White
    • PACB29CO portable air conditioner Black:Black
  • Weight
    • AM12AA1GAA portable air conditioner:28 kg
    • PACB29CO portable air conditioner Black:34 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of AM12AA1GAA, PACB29CO
37 specifications
Features2 differ
TypeMonobloc mobile air conditionerMonobloc mobile air conditioner
Air conditioner functionsDiffersCooling, Dehumidifying, Fan, HeatingCooling, Dehumidifying
Comfort sleeping modeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Cooling capacity (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source9000 BTU/h
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)Differs2.612.6
Dehumidifier functionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Sound power levelKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source64 dB
Suitable for room area up toKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 m²
Air filterKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Filter typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceHEPA
Refrigerating mediumR290R290
Remotely operatedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Global warming potential33
Cooling temperature rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source21 - 32 °C
Cooling capacity in watts (nominal)Known for one3500 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Heating capacity in watts (nominal)Known for one3300 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Dehumidifying capacityKnown for one1.2 l/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Sound pressure level (max)Known for one56 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Noise levelKnown for one65 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Refrigerating medium weightKnown for one245 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Energy efficiency class (cooling)AA
AC input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source220-240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 Hz
CurrentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6.5 A
Energy efficiency class (heating)Known for oneA+Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy efficiency scaleKnown for oneA+++ to DUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (cooling)Known for one1370 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (heating)Known for one1350 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Current (cooling)Known for one5.9 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Built-in displayYesYes
Product colourDiffersWhiteBlack
Display typeKnown for oneLCDUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source448 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source400 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source744 mm
WeightDiffers28 kg34 kg
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source38.5 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable air conditioner comparisons

All portable air conditioner comparisons