Product comparison · 2 portable air conditioners

Haier AM12AA1GAA portable air conditioner vs MEDION LIFE E701

Add a product
  • 11specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 6identical
  • 28known for one product only

Key differences

The Haier AM12AA1GAA portable air conditioner has 0.01 more cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W) than the MEDION LIFE E701 (2.61 vs 2.6). The Haier AM12AA1GAA portable air conditioner has 0.4 l/h more dehumidifying capacity than the MEDION LIFE E701 (1.2 l/h vs 0.8 l/h). The Haier AM12AA1GAA portable air conditioner has 8 kg more weight than the MEDION LIFE E701 (28 kg vs 20 kg). Air conditioner functions: Cooling, Dehumidifying, Fan, Heating on the Haier AM12AA1GAA portable air conditioner, Cooling, Dehumidifying, Ventilating on the MEDION LIFE E701. Energy efficiency class (heating): A+ on the Haier AM12AA1GAA portable air conditioner, No on the MEDION LIFE E701.

  • Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)
    • AM12AA1GAA portable air conditioner:2.61
    • LIFE E701:2.6
  • Dehumidifying capacity
    • AM12AA1GAA portable air conditioner:1.2 l/h
    • LIFE E701:0.8 l/h
  • Energy efficiency class (heating)
    • AM12AA1GAA portable air conditioner:A+
    • LIFE E701:No
  • Weight
    • AM12AA1GAA portable air conditioner:28 kg
    • LIFE E701:20 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of AM12AA1GAA, LIFE E701
39 specifications
Features3 differ
Air conditioner functionsDiffersCooling, Dehumidifying, Fan, HeatingCooling, Dehumidifying, Ventilating
Comfort sleeping modeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Variable powerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Cooling capacity (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7000 BTU/h
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)Differs2.612.6
Dehumidifier functionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Number of speedsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Dehumidifying capacityDiffers1.2 l/h0.8 l/h
Suitable for room area up toKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source25 m²
Air filterKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
TimerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Castor wheelsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Cooling capacity in watts (nominal)Known for one3500 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Heating capacity in watts (nominal)Known for one3300 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Sound pressure level (max)Known for one56 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Refrigerating medium weightKnown for one245 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Global warming potentialKnown for one3Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Energy efficiency class (heating)DiffersA+No
Hourly energy consumption (cooling)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.8 kWh
Power consumption (cooling)Known for one1370 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (heating)Known for one1350 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Current (cooling)Known for one5.9 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Built-in displayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Display typeKnown for oneLCDUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source302 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source282 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source692 mm
WeightDiffers28 kg20 kg
Technical detailsidentical
Warranty periodKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 year(s)
Batteryidentical
Remote control battery typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAAA
Number of remote control batteriesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Packaging contentidentical
Remote control batteries includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Remote control includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable air conditioner comparisons

All portable air conditioner comparisons