Product comparison · 2 portable air conditioners

Electrolux ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner vs MEDION MD 37732

Add a product
  • 16specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 4identical
  • 20known for one product only

Key differences

The Electrolux ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner has 3,000 BTU/h more cooling capacity (max) than the MEDION MD 37732 (12000 BTU/h vs 9000 BTU/h). The Electrolux ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner has 0.5 more cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W) than the MEDION MD 37732 (3.1 vs 2.6). The Electrolux ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner has 2.3 l/h more dehumidifying capacity than the MEDION MD 37732 (3.3 l/h vs 1 l/h). Air conditioner functions: Cooling, Fan, Dehumidifying on the Electrolux ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner, Cooling, Dehumidifying, Fan on the MEDION MD 37732. Energy efficiency class (cooling): A+ on the Electrolux ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner, A on the MEDION MD 37732.

  • Air conditioner functions
    • ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner:Cooling, Fan, Dehumidifying
    • MD 37732:Cooling, Dehumidifying, Fan
  • Cooling capacity (max)
    • ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner:12000 BTU/h
    • MD 37732:9000 BTU/h
  • Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)
    • ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner:3.1
    • MD 37732:2.6
  • Dehumidifying capacity
    • ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner:3.3 l/h
    • MD 37732:1 l/h
  • Noise level
    • ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner:64 dB
    • MD 37732:65 dB
  • Suitable for room area up to
    • ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner:49 m²
    • MD 37732:32 m²
  • Energy efficiency class (cooling)
    • ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner:A+
    • MD 37732:A
  • Product colour
    • ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner:White
    • MD 37732:Black

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of ECU7878CSW, MD 37732
36 specifications
Features6 differ
Air conditioner functionsDiffersCooling, Fan, DehumidifyingCooling, Dehumidifying, Fan
Cooling capacity (max)Differs12000 BTU/h9000 BTU/h
Cooling capacity in watts (nominal)Known for one3400 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)Differs3.12.6
Dehumidifying capacityDiffers3.3 l/h1 l/h
Noise levelDiffers64 dB65 dB
Airflow (low speed)Known for one300 m³/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Airflow (high speed)Known for one430 m³/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Suitable for room area up toDiffers49 m²32 m²
Remotely operatedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Castor wheelsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Cord lengthKnown for one1.8 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of speedsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Water tank capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.65 L
Airflow (medium speed)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source330 m³/h
TimerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Timer typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDigital
Voice controlKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power1 differ
Energy efficiency class (cooling)DiffersA+A
Energy efficiency scaleKnown for oneA+++ to DUnknown — not stated by the source
Hourly energy consumption (cooling)Known for one1.1 kWhUnknown — not stated by the source
Annual energy consumption (cooling)Known for one252 kWhUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one220-240 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Design load (cooling)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.6 kW
Design1 differ
Built-in displayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Display typeKnown for oneLEDUnknown — not stated by the source
Product colourDiffersWhiteBlack
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers460 mm315 mm
DepthDiffers415 mm310 mm
HeightDiffers795 mm700 mm
WeightDiffers30 kg22.5 kg
Package weightKnown for one33.5 kgUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable air conditioner comparisons

All portable air conditioner comparisons