Product comparison · 2 portable air conditioners

Electrolux ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner vs MEDION LIFE P702

Add a product
  • 21specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 8identical
  • 13known for one product only

Key differences

The Electrolux ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner has 5,000 BTU/h more cooling capacity (max) than the MEDION LIFE P702 (12000 BTU/h vs 7000 BTU/h). The Electrolux ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner has 0.5 more cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W) than the MEDION LIFE P702 (3.1 vs 2.6). The Electrolux ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner has 2.5 l/h more dehumidifying capacity than the MEDION LIFE P702 (3.3 l/h vs 0.8 l/h). Air conditioner functions: Cooling, Fan, Dehumidifying on the Electrolux ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner, Cooling, Dehumidifying, Ventilating on the MEDION LIFE P702. Energy efficiency class (cooling): A+ on the Electrolux ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner, A on the MEDION LIFE P702.

  • Cooling capacity (max)
    • ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner:12000 BTU/h
    • LIFE P702:7000 BTU/h
  • Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)
    • ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner:3.1
    • LIFE P702:2.6
  • Dehumidifying capacity
    • ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner:3.3 l/h
    • LIFE P702:0.8 l/h
  • Noise level
    • ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner:64 dB
    • LIFE P702:65 dB
  • Airflow (high speed)
    • ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner:430 m³/h
    • LIFE P702:300 m³/h
  • Suitable for room area up to
    • ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner:49 m²
    • LIFE P702:25 m²
  • Energy efficiency class (cooling)
    • ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner:A+
    • LIFE P702:A
  • Hourly energy consumption (cooling)
    • ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner:1.1 kWh
    • LIFE P702:0.8 kWh

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of ECU7878CSW, LIFE P702
34 specifications
Features7 differ
TypeMonobloc mobile air conditionerMonobloc mobile air conditioner
Air conditioner functionsDiffersCooling, Fan, DehumidifyingCooling, Dehumidifying, Ventilating
Comfort sleeping modeYesYes
Cooling capacity (max)Differs12000 BTU/h7000 BTU/h
Cooling capacity in watts (nominal)Known for one3400 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)Differs3.12.6
Dehumidifying capacityDiffers3.3 l/h0.8 l/h
Noise levelDiffers64 dB65 dB
Airflow (low speed)Known for one300 m³/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Airflow (high speed)Differs430 m³/h300 m³/h
Suitable for room area up toDiffers49 m²25 m²
Air filterYesYes
Refrigerating mediumR290R290
Remotely operatedYesYes
Castor wheelsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Cord lengthKnown for one1.8 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling capacity in watts (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2100 W
Water tank capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.7 L
TimerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Voice controlKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency class (cooling)DiffersA+A
Energy efficiency scaleA+++ to DA+++ to D
Hourly energy consumption (cooling)Differs1.1 kWh0.8 kWh
Annual energy consumption (cooling)Known for one252 kWhUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one220-240 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Built-in displayYesYes
Display typeKnown for oneLEDUnknown — not stated by the source
Product colourWhiteWhite
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers460 mm350 mm
DepthDiffers415 mm350 mm
HeightDiffers795 mm700 mm
WeightDiffers30 kg22 kg
Package weightKnown for one33.5 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Remote control includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable air conditioner comparisons

All portable air conditioner comparisons