Product comparison · 2 portable air conditioners

Electrolux ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner vs MEDION LIFE E901

Add a product
  • 19specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 6identical
  • 19known for one product only

Key differences

The Electrolux ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner has 3,000 BTU/h more cooling capacity (max) than the MEDION LIFE E901 (12000 BTU/h vs 9000 BTU/h). The Electrolux ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner has 0.5 more cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W) than the MEDION LIFE E901 (3.1 vs 2.6). The Electrolux ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner has 2.3 l/h more dehumidifying capacity than the MEDION LIFE E901 (3.3 l/h vs 1 l/h). Air conditioner functions: Cooling, Fan, Dehumidifying on the Electrolux ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner, Cooling, Dehumidifying, Ventilating on the MEDION LIFE E901. Energy efficiency class (cooling): A+ on the Electrolux ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner, A on the MEDION LIFE E901.

  • Cooling capacity (max)
    • ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner:12000 BTU/h
    • LIFE E901:9000 BTU/h
  • Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)
    • ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner:3.1
    • LIFE E901:2.6
  • Dehumidifying capacity
    • ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner:3.3 l/h
    • LIFE E901:1 l/h
  • Noise level
    • ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner:64 dB
    • LIFE E901:65 dB
  • Airflow (low speed)
    • ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner:300 m³/h
    • LIFE E901:290 m³/h
  • Suitable for room area up to
    • ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner:49 m²
    • LIFE E901:32 m²
  • Energy efficiency class (cooling)
    • ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner:A+
    • LIFE E901:A
  • Hourly energy consumption (cooling)
    • ECU7878CSW portable air conditioner:1.1 kWh
    • LIFE E901:1 kWh

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of ECU7878CSW, LIFE E901
38 specifications
Features7 differ
Air conditioner functionsDiffersCooling, Fan, DehumidifyingCooling, Dehumidifying, Ventilating
Cooling capacity (max)Differs12000 BTU/h9000 BTU/h
Cooling capacity in watts (nominal)Known for one3400 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)Differs3.12.6
Dehumidifying capacityDiffers3.3 l/h1 l/h
Noise levelDiffers64 dB65 dB
Airflow (low speed)Differs300 m³/h290 m³/h
Airflow (high speed)Known for one430 m³/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Suitable for room area up toDiffers49 m²32 m²
Remotely operatedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Castor wheelsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Cord lengthKnown for one1.8 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Variable powerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Dehumidifier functionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
TimerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency class (cooling)DiffersA+A
Hourly energy consumption (cooling)Differs1.1 kWh1 kWh
Annual energy consumption (cooling)Known for one252 kWhUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one220-240 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Energy efficiency class (heating)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Designidentical
Built-in displayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Display typeKnown for oneLEDUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers460 mm300 mm
DepthDiffers415 mm290 mm
HeightDiffers795 mm690 mm
WeightDiffers30 kg22 kg
Package weightKnown for one33.5 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Warranty periodKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 year(s)
Batteryidentical
Remote control battery typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAAA
Number of remote control batteriesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Packaging contentidentical
Remote control batteries includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Remote control includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable air conditioner comparisons

All portable air conditioner comparisons