Product comparison · 2 portable air conditioners

Dreame P-Wind10 7000 vs MEDION MD 37732

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 8identical
  • 29known for one product only

Key differences

The MEDION MD 37732 has 2,000 BTU/h more cooling capacity (max) than the Dreame P-Wind10 7000 (9000 BTU/h vs 7000 BTU/h). The MEDION MD 37732 has 7 m² more suitable for room area up to than the Dreame P-Wind10 7000 (32 m² vs 25 m²). The MEDION MD 37732 has 10 mm more width than the Dreame P-Wind10 7000 (315 mm vs 305 mm). Air conditioner functions: Cooling, Fan, Dehumidifying on the Dreame P-Wind10 7000, Cooling, Dehumidifying, Fan on the MEDION MD 37732. Product colour: Gold, Sand on the Dreame P-Wind10 7000, Black on the MEDION MD 37732.

  • Air conditioner functions
    • P-Wind10 7000:Cooling, Fan, Dehumidifying
    • MD 37732:Cooling, Dehumidifying, Fan
  • Cooling capacity (max)
    • P-Wind10 7000:7000 BTU/h
    • MD 37732:9000 BTU/h
  • Suitable for room area up to
    • P-Wind10 7000:25 m²
    • MD 37732:32 m²
  • Product colour
    • P-Wind10 7000:Gold, Sand
    • MD 37732:Black
  • Width
    • P-Wind10 7000:305 mm
    • MD 37732:315 mm
  • Depth
    • P-Wind10 7000:285 mm
    • MD 37732:310 mm
  • Weight
    • P-Wind10 7000:20.8 kg
    • MD 37732:22.5 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of P-Wind10 7000, MD 37732
44 specifications
Features3 differ
Air conditioner functionsDiffersCooling, Fan, DehumidifyingCooling, Dehumidifying, Fan
Inverter technologyKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling capacity (max)Differs7000 BTU/h9000 BTU/h
Cooling capacity in watts (max)Known for one2100 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Dehumidifier functionKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Sound power levelKnown for one65 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Sound pressure level (min)Known for one51 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Sound pressure level (max)Known for one54 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Airflow (high speed)Known for one290 m³/hUnknown — not stated by the source
On/off switchKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Suitable for room area up toDiffers25 m²32 m²
Timer duration (maximum)Known for one24 hUnknown — not stated by the source
Remotely operatedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Castor wheelsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Handle(s)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of wheelsKnown for one4 wheel(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Cooling temperature rangeKnown for one16 - 32 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Auto power offKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of speedsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Water tank capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.65 L
Dehumidifying capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 l/h
Airflow (medium speed)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source330 m³/h
Air filterKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Refrigerating mediumKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceR290
Timer typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDigital
Voice controlKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Poweridentical
Power plug typeKnown for oneType GUnknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Built-in displayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Display typeKnown for oneLEDUnknown — not stated by the source
Product colourDiffersGold, SandBlack
Control typeKnown for oneTouchUnknown — not stated by the source
Carrying handle(s)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers305 mm315 mm
DepthDiffers285 mm310 mm
WeightDiffers20.8 kg22.5 kg
Certificatesidentical
Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) complianceKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable air conditioner comparisons

All portable air conditioner comparisons