Product comparison · 2 portable air conditioners

De’Longhi Pinguino GentleJet vs MEDION LIFE P1002

Add a product
  • 17specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 8identical
  • 28known for one product only

Key differences

The MEDION LIFE P1002 has 8,800 BTU/h more cooling capacity (max) than the De’Longhi Pinguino GentleJet (10000 BTU/h vs 1200 BTU/h). The De’Longhi Pinguino GentleJet has 0.7 more cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W) than the MEDION LIFE P1002 (3.3 vs 2.6). The De’Longhi Pinguino GentleJet has 2.2 l/h more dehumidifying capacity than the MEDION LIFE P1002 (3.2 l/h vs 1 l/h). Energy efficiency class (cooling): A+ on the De’Longhi Pinguino GentleJet, A on the MEDION LIFE P1002.

  • Cooling capacity (max)
    • Pinguino GentleJet:1200 BTU/h
    • LIFE P1002:10000 BTU/h
  • Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)
    • Pinguino GentleJet:3.3
    • LIFE P1002:2.6
  • Dehumidifying capacity
    • Pinguino GentleJet:3.2 l/h
    • LIFE P1002:1 l/h
  • Energy efficiency class (cooling)
    • Pinguino GentleJet:A+
    • LIFE P1002:A
  • Hourly energy consumption (cooling)
    • Pinguino GentleJet:0.9 kWh
    • LIFE P1002:1.1 kWh
  • Width
    • Pinguino GentleJet:457 mm
    • LIFE P1002:350 mm
  • Depth
    • Pinguino GentleJet:363 mm
    • LIFE P1002:350 mm
  • Height
    • Pinguino GentleJet:814 mm
    • LIFE P1002:700 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of Pinguino GentleJet, LIFE P1002
45 specifications
Features3 differ
Cooling capacity (max)Differs1200 BTU/h10000 BTU/h
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)Differs3.32.6
Number of speedsKnown for one3Unknown — not stated by the source
Dehumidifying capacityDiffers3.2 l/h1 l/h
Sound power levelKnown for one63 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Sound pressure level (min)Known for one42 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Sound pressure level (max)Known for one49 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Airflow (low speed)Known for one250 m³/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Airflow (medium speed)Known for one310 m³/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Timer duration (maximum)Known for one24 hUnknown — not stated by the source
Handle(s)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Comfort sleeping modeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Noise levelKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source65 dB
Suitable for room area up toKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source34 m²
Air filterKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Refrigerating mediumKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceR290
Voice controlKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency class (cooling)DiffersA+A
Connected loadKnown for one3000 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Hourly energy consumption (cooling)Differs0.9 kWh1.1 kWh
AC input voltageKnown for one220 - 240 VUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input frequencyKnown for one50 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Design load (cooling)Known for one3 kWUnknown — not stated by the source
PowerKnown for one910 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (standby)Known for one0.8 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Built-in displayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Display typeKnown for oneLEDUnknown — not stated by the source
Control typeKnown for oneTouchUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers457 mm350 mm
DepthDiffers363 mm350 mm
HeightDiffers814 mm700 mm
WeightDiffers35 kg22 kg
Package widthKnown for one550 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one470 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one880 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one39.5 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Warranty periodKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 year(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable air conditioner comparisons

All portable air conditioner comparisons