Product comparison · 2 portable air conditioners

De’Longhi PACAP98GENTLEJET portable air conditioner vs Electrolux ECU7677CSW portable air conditioner White

Add a product
  • 21specifications compared
  • 14differ
  • 7identical
  • 36known for one product only

Key differences

The De’Longhi PACAP98GENTLEJET portable air conditioner has 2,500 BTU/h more cooling capacity (max) than the Electrolux ECU7677CSW portable air conditioner White (11500 BTU/h vs 9000 BTU/h). The Electrolux ECU7677CSW portable air conditioner White has 0.5 more cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W) than the De’Longhi PACAP98GENTLEJET portable air conditioner (3.6 vs 3.1). The Electrolux ECU7677CSW portable air conditioner White has 0.38 l/h more dehumidifying capacity than the De’Longhi PACAP98GENTLEJET portable air conditioner (3.3 l/h vs 2.92 l/h). Air conditioner functions: Cooling, Dehumidifying, Fan on the De’Longhi PACAP98GENTLEJET portable air conditioner, Fan, Cooling, Dehumidifying on the Electrolux ECU7677CSW portable air conditioner White. Energy efficiency class (cooling): A+ on the De’Longhi PACAP98GENTLEJET portable air conditioner, A++ on the Electrolux ECU7677CSW portable air conditioner White.

  • Air conditioner functions
    • PACAP98GENTLEJET portable air conditioner:Cooling, Dehumidifying, Fan
    • ECU7677CSW portable air conditioner White:Fan, Cooling, Dehumidifying
  • Cooling capacity (max)
    • PACAP98GENTLEJET portable air conditioner:11500 BTU/h
    • ECU7677CSW portable air conditioner White:9000 BTU/h
  • Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)
    • PACAP98GENTLEJET portable air conditioner:3.1
    • ECU7677CSW portable air conditioner White:3.6
  • Dehumidifying capacity
    • PACAP98GENTLEJET portable air conditioner:2.92 l/h
    • ECU7677CSW portable air conditioner White:3.3 l/h
  • Sound power level
    • PACAP98GENTLEJET portable air conditioner:62 dB
    • ECU7677CSW portable air conditioner White:64 dB
  • Airflow (low speed)
    • PACAP98GENTLEJET portable air conditioner:250 m³/h
    • ECU7677CSW portable air conditioner White:300 m³/h
  • Airflow (medium speed)
    • PACAP98GENTLEJET portable air conditioner:310 m³/h
    • ECU7677CSW portable air conditioner White:360 m³/h
  • Airflow (high speed)
    • PACAP98GENTLEJET portable air conditioner:350 m³/h
    • ECU7677CSW portable air conditioner White:430 m³/h

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of PACAP98GENTLEJET, ECU7677CSW
57 specifications
Features8 differ
TypeMonobloc mobile air conditionerMonobloc mobile air conditioner
Air conditioner functionsDiffersCooling, Dehumidifying, FanFan, Cooling, Dehumidifying
Comfort sleeping modeKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Variable powerKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling capacity (max)Differs11500 BTU/h9000 BTU/h
Cooling capacity in watts (max)Known for one2700 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)Differs3.13.6
Dehumidifier functionKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Built-in fanKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of speeds33
Dehumidifying capacityDiffers2.92 l/h3.3 l/h
Sound power levelDiffers62 dB64 dB
Sound pressure level (min)Known for one41 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Sound pressure level (max)Known for one47 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Airflow (low speed)Differs250 m³/h300 m³/h
Airflow (medium speed)Differs310 m³/h360 m³/h
Airflow (high speed)Differs350 m³/h430 m³/h
On/off switchKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Suitable for room volume up toKnown for one100 m³Unknown — not stated by the source
Hose lengthKnown for one1.25 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Air filterKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Refrigerating mediumR290R290
TimerYesYes
Timer typeKnown for oneDigitalUnknown — not stated by the source
Timer duration (maximum)Known for one24 hUnknown — not stated by the source
OscillationKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Remotely operatedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Castor wheelsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Handle(s)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Adjustable thermostatKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling capacity in watts (nominal)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2600 W
Wi-FiKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Suitable for room area up toKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source35 m²
Global warming potentialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3
Cord lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.8 m
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency class (cooling)DiffersA+A++
Energy efficiency scaleKnown for oneA+++ to DUnknown — not stated by the source
Connected loadKnown for one875 WUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageDiffers220 - 240 V220-240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for one50 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (standby)Known for one0.8 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Hourly energy consumption (cooling)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.8 kWh
Annual energy consumption (cooling)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source381.5 kWh
Designidentical
Built-in displayYesYes
Display typeLEDLED
Product colourWhiteWhite
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers457 mm460 mm
DepthDiffers363 mm415 mm
HeightDiffers814 mm795 mm
WeightDiffers37.8 kg30 kg
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source525 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source465 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source885 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source33.5 kg
Technical detailsidentical
Package volumeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source216060 cm³
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 - 35 °C
Packaging contentidentical
Remote control includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable air conditioner comparisons

All portable air conditioner comparisons