Product comparison · 2 portable air conditioners

De’Longhi AP140i GentleJet vs De’Longhi Pinguino PACEX100SILENT

29specifications compared
16differ
13identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

The De’Longhi AP140i GentleJet has 4,000 BTU/h more cooling capacity (max) than the De’Longhi Pinguino PACEX100SILENT (14000 BTU/h vs 10000 BTU/h). The De’Longhi Pinguino PACEX100SILENT has 0.7 more cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W) than the De’Longhi AP140i GentleJet (3.6 vs 2.9). The De’Longhi AP140i GentleJet has 71.67 l/h more dehumidifying capacity than the De’Longhi Pinguino PACEX100SILENT (73 l/h vs 1.33 l/h). Energy efficiency class (cooling): A+ on the De’Longhi AP140i GentleJet, A++ on the De’Longhi Pinguino PACEX100SILENT. AC input voltage: 220 - 240 V on the De’Longhi AP140i GentleJet, 220-240 V on the De’Longhi Pinguino PACEX100SILENT.

Cooling capacity (max)
- AP140i GentleJet:14000 BTU/h
- Pinguino PACEX100SILENT:10000 BTU/h
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)
- AP140i GentleJet:2.9
- Pinguino PACEX100SILENT:3.6
Dehumidifying capacity
- AP140i GentleJet:73 l/h
- Pinguino PACEX100SILENT:1.33 l/h
Sound pressure level (max)
- AP140i GentleJet:65 dB
- Pinguino PACEX100SILENT:53 dB
Noise level
- AP140i GentleJet:50 dB
- Pinguino PACEX100SILENT:64 dB
Airflow (low speed)
- AP140i GentleJet:265 m³/h
- Pinguino PACEX100SILENT:250 m³/h
Airflow (medium speed)
- AP140i GentleJet:290 m³/h
- Pinguino PACEX100SILENT:310 m³/h
Airflow (high speed)
- AP140i GentleJet:380 m³/h
- Pinguino PACEX100SILENT:350 m³/h

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of AP140i GentleJet, Pinguino PACEX100SILENT
47 specifications	A De’Longhi AP140i GentleJet View product	B De’Longhi Pinguino PACEX100SILENT View product
Features10 differ
Variable powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Cooling capacity (max)Differs	14000 BTU/h	10000 BTU/h
Cooling capacity in watts (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2500 W
Heating capacity in watts (nominal)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 W
Heating capacity in watts (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 W
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)Differs	2.9	3.6
Built-in fanKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Dehumidifying capacityDiffers	73 l/h	1.33 l/h
Sound power levelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	64 dB
Sound pressure level (min)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	49 dB
Sound pressure level (max)Differs	65 dB	53 dB
Noise levelDiffers	50 dB	64 dB
Airflow (low speed)Differs	265 m³/h	250 m³/h
Airflow (medium speed)Differs	290 m³/h	310 m³/h
Airflow (high speed)Differs	380 m³/h	350 m³/h
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Suitable for room volume up toDiffers	140 m³	100 m³
Hose lengthDiffers	1.25 m	1.2 m
Hose diameterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	13 cm
Air filterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Timer typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Digital
Cooling capacity in watts (nominal)Known for one	3700 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency class (cooling)Differs	A+	A++
Hourly energy consumption (cooling)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.7 kWh
AC input voltageDiffers	220 - 240 V	220-240 V
Power consumption (cooling)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	700 W
PowerKnown for one	1280 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	0.8 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Control typeKnown for one	Touch	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	457 mm	440 mm
DepthDiffers	363 mm	387 mm
HeightDiffers	814 mm	806 mm
WeightDiffers	36.8 kg	30 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Remote control includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable air conditioner comparisons

All portable air conditioner comparisons