All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 portable air conditioners

Beko BP108SAC portable air conditioner White vs Rowenta FDARWAC12 portable air conditioner

Add a product
  • 21specifications compared
  • 14differ
  • 7identical
  • 24known for one product only

Key differences

The Rowenta FDARWAC12 portable air conditioner has 7 dB more sound power level than the Beko BP108SAC portable air conditioner White (65 dB vs 58 dB). The Rowenta FDARWAC12 portable air conditioner has 5 dB more sound pressure level (min) than the Beko BP108SAC portable air conditioner White (49 dB vs 44 dB). The Rowenta FDARWAC12 portable air conditioner has 70 m³/h more airflow (high speed) than the Beko BP108SAC portable air conditioner White (390 m³/h vs 320 m³/h). Air conditioner functions: Cooling, Fan on the Beko BP108SAC portable air conditioner White, Cooling, Dehumidifying, Heating on the Rowenta FDARWAC12 portable air conditioner.

  • Sound power level
    • 58 dB
    • 65 dB
  • Sound pressure level (min)
    • 44 dB
    • 49 dB
  • Airflow (high speed)
    • 320 m³/h
    • 390 m³/h
  • Hourly energy consumption (cooling)
    • 0.8 kWh
    • 1.1 kWh
  • Design load (cooling)
    • 2.3 kW
    • 3.5 kW
  • Width
    • 440 mm
    • 419 mm
  • Depth
    • 357 mm
    • 358 mm
  • Height
    • 690 mm
    • 688 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
45 specifications
A

Beko

BP108SAC portable air conditioner White

Model BP108SAC

View product
B

Rowenta

FDARWAC12 portable air conditioner

Model FDARWAC12

View product
Features4 differ
TypeMonobloc mobile air conditionerMonobloc mobile air conditioner
Air conditioner functionsDiffersCooling, FanCooling, Dehumidifying, Heating
Cooling capacity in watts (nominal)Known for one3500 W
Heating capacity in watts (nominal)Known for one2930 W
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)3.13.1
Heating energy efficiency (COP, W/W)Known for one3.1
Water tank capacityKnown for one0.8 L
Sound power levelDiffers58 dB65 dB
Sound pressure level (min)Differs44 dB49 dB
Sound pressure level (max)Known for one53 dB
Noise levelKnown for one65 dB
Airflow (medium speed)Known for one280 m³/h
Airflow (high speed)Differs320 m³/h390 m³/h
Refrigerating mediumR290R290
Cooling capacity (max)Known for one8000 BTU/h
Cooling capacity in watts (max)Known for one2300 W
Wi-FiKnown for oneYes
Suitable for room area up toKnown for one25 m²
Voice controlKnown for oneYes
Castor wheelsKnown for oneYes
Cooling temperature rangeKnown for one18 - 35 °C
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency class (cooling)A+A+
Energy efficiency class (heating) (Average heating season)Known for oneA++
Hourly energy consumption (cooling)Differs0.8 kWh1.1 kWh
Hourly energy consumption (heating)Known for one0.9 kWh
AC input voltage220 - 240 V220 - 240 V
AC input frequency50 Hz50 Hz
Design load (cooling)Differs2.3 kW3.5 kW
Design load (heating) (Average heating season)Known for one2.9 kW
Power consumption (cooling)Known for one1125 W
Power consumption (heating)Known for one945 W
Current (cooling)Known for one5.1 A
Current (heating)Known for one4.3 A
Energy efficiency scaleKnown for oneA+++ to D
Designidentical
Product colourWhiteWhite
Built-in displayKnown for oneYes
Weight & dimensions8 differ
WidthDiffers440 mm419 mm
DepthDiffers357 mm358 mm
HeightDiffers690 mm688 mm
WeightDiffers27 kg30.2 kg
Package widthDiffers474 mm460 mm
Package depthDiffers376 mm396 mm
Package heightDiffers885 mm865 mm
Package weightDiffers30 kg37.9 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Remote control includedKnown for oneYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable air conditioner comparisons

All portable air conditioner comparisons