Product comparison · 2 portable air conditioners

Beko 8501833200 portable air conditioner vs Beko 8805043200 portable air conditioner White

Add a product
  • 26specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 18identical
  • 16known for one product only

Key differences

The Beko 8805043200 portable air conditioner White has 0.1 more cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W) than the Beko 8501833200 portable air conditioner (2.7 vs 2.6). The Beko 8805043200 portable air conditioner White has 0.2 l/h more dehumidifying capacity than the Beko 8501833200 portable air conditioner (1.2 l/h vs 1 l/h). The Beko 8805043200 portable air conditioner White has 27 mm more width than the Beko 8501833200 portable air conditioner (467 mm vs 440 mm).

  • Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)
    • 8501833200 portable air conditioner:2.6
    • 8805043200 portable air conditioner White:2.7
  • Dehumidifying capacity
    • 8501833200 portable air conditioner:1 l/h
    • 8805043200 portable air conditioner White:1.2 l/h
  • Width
    • 8501833200 portable air conditioner:440 mm
    • 8805043200 portable air conditioner White:467 mm
  • Depth
    • 8501833200 portable air conditioner:335 mm
    • 8805043200 portable air conditioner White:397 mm
  • Height
    • 8501833200 portable air conditioner:715 mm
    • 8805043200 portable air conditioner White:765 mm
  • Weight
    • 8501833200 portable air conditioner:28.5 kg
    • 8805043200 portable air conditioner White:34 kg
  • Package height
    • 8501833200 portable air conditioner:885 mm
    • 8805043200 portable air conditioner White:880 mm
  • Package weight
    • 8501833200 portable air conditioner:32 kg
    • 8805043200 portable air conditioner White:39 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 8501833200, 8805043200
42 specifications
Features2 differ
Air conditioner functionsCooling, DehumidifyingCooling, Dehumidifying
Comfort sleeping modeYesYes
Cooling capacity (max)Known for one8871 BTU/hUnknown — not stated by the source
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)Differs2.62.7
Dehumidifier functionYesYes
Automatic temperature controlYesYes
Wi-FiKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of speeds33
Dehumidifying capacityDiffers1 l/h1.2 l/h
Sound power level65 dB65 dB
Noise levelKnown for one65 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Airflow (high speed)380 m³/h380 m³/h
Suitable for room area up toKnown for one18 m²Unknown — not stated by the source
Air filterYesYes
Washable filterYesYes
Refrigerating mediumKnown for oneR290Unknown — not stated by the source
Refrigerating medium weightKnown for one212 gUnknown — not stated by the source
TimerYesYes
Timer duration (maximum)24 h24 h
Global warming potentialKnown for one3Unknown — not stated by the source
Cooling temperature rangeKnown for one18 - 35 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Auto-restartYesYes
Cooling capacity in watts (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1298 W
Poweridentical
Energy efficiency class (cooling)AA
AC input voltage220 - 240 V220 - 240 V
AC input frequency50 Hz50 Hz
Design load (cooling)Known for one1 kWUnknown — not stated by the source
Current (cooling)Known for one4.3 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Built-in displayYesYes
Display typeLCDLCD
Product colourWhiteWhite
Weight & dimensions6 differ
WidthDiffers440 mm467 mm
DepthDiffers335 mm397 mm
HeightDiffers715 mm765 mm
WeightDiffers28.5 kg34 kg
Package widthKnown for one545 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one435 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightDiffers885 mm880 mm
Package weightDiffers32 kg39 kg
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Manual languagesKnown for oneEnglishUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable air conditioner comparisons

All portable air conditioner comparisons