All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 portable air conditioners

AEG ACU7878CSW portable air conditioner vs Rowenta FDARWAC12 portable air conditioner

Add a product
  • 19specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 6identical
  • 28known for one product only

Key differences

The Rowenta FDARWAC12 portable air conditioner has 100 W more cooling capacity in watts (nominal) than the AEG ACU7878CSW portable air conditioner (3500 W vs 3400 W). The Rowenta FDARWAC12 portable air conditioner has 1 dB more noise level than the AEG ACU7878CSW portable air conditioner (65 dB vs 64 dB). The AEG ACU7878CSW portable air conditioner has 80 m³/h more airflow (medium speed) than the Rowenta FDARWAC12 portable air conditioner (360 m³/h vs 280 m³/h). Air conditioner functions: Cooling, Dehumidifying, Fan on the AEG ACU7878CSW portable air conditioner, Cooling, Dehumidifying, Heating on the Rowenta FDARWAC12 portable air conditioner.

  • Cooling capacity in watts (nominal)
    • 3400 W
    • 3500 W
  • Noise level
    • 64 dB
    • 65 dB
  • Airflow (medium speed)
    • 360 m³/h
    • 280 m³/h
  • Airflow (high speed)
    • 430 m³/h
    • 390 m³/h
  • Width
    • 460 mm
    • 419 mm
  • Depth
    • 415 mm
    • 358 mm
  • Height
    • 795 mm
    • 688 mm
  • Weight
    • 30 kg
    • 30.2 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
47 specifications
A

AEG

ACU7878CSW portable air conditioner

Model ACU7878CSW

View product
B

Rowenta

FDARWAC12 portable air conditioner

Model FDARWAC12

View product
Features5 differ
TypeMonobloc mobile air conditionerMonobloc mobile air conditioner
Air conditioner functionsDiffersCooling, Dehumidifying, FanCooling, Dehumidifying, Heating
Cooling capacity in watts (nominal)Differs3400 W3500 W
Heating capacity in watts (nominal)Known for one2930 W
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)3.13.1
Heating energy efficiency (COP, W/W)Known for one3.1
Water tank capacityKnown for one0.8 L
Sound power levelKnown for one65 dB
Sound pressure level (min)Known for one49 dB
Sound pressure level (max)Known for one53 dB
Noise levelDiffers64 dB65 dB
Airflow (medium speed)Differs360 m³/h280 m³/h
Airflow (high speed)Differs430 m³/h390 m³/h
Refrigerating mediumR290R290
Inverter technologyKnown for oneYes
Cooling capacity (max)Known for one12000 BTU/h
Dehumidifier functionKnown for oneYes
Wi-FiKnown for oneYes
Airflow (low speed)Known for one300 m³/h
Suitable for room area up toKnown for one49 m²
Hose lengthKnown for one1.8 m
Air filterKnown for oneYes
Filter typeKnown for oneHEPA
Global warming potentialKnown for one3
Poweridentical
Energy efficiency class (cooling)A+A+
Energy efficiency class (heating) (Average heating season)Known for oneA++
Hourly energy consumption (cooling)1.1 kWh1.1 kWh
Hourly energy consumption (heating)Known for one0.9 kWh
AC input voltageKnown for one220 - 240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for one50 Hz
Design load (cooling)Known for one3.5 kW
Design load (heating) (Average heating season)Known for one2.9 kW
Power consumption (cooling)Known for one1125 W
Power consumption (heating)Known for one945 W
Current (cooling)Known for one5.1 A
Current (heating)Known for one4.3 A
Designidentical
Product colourWhiteWhite
Built-in displayKnown for oneYes
Display typeKnown for oneLED
Weight & dimensions8 differ
WidthDiffers460 mm419 mm
DepthDiffers415 mm358 mm
HeightDiffers795 mm688 mm
WeightDiffers30 kg30.2 kg
Package widthDiffers525 mm460 mm
Package depthDiffers465 mm396 mm
Package heightDiffers885 mm865 mm
Package weightDiffers33.5 kg37.9 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable air conditioner comparisons

All portable air conditioner comparisons