PATCHBOX C36UTPXC6XXX1G PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet vs TP-Link Omada PoE++ Injector Adapter

Key differences

The PATCHBOX C36UTPXC6XXX1G PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet has 10 - 45 °C more operating temperature (T-T) than the TP-Link Omada PoE++ Injector Adapter (10 - 45 °C vs 0 - 45 °C). The TP-Link Omada PoE++ Injector Adapter has 105 mm more width than the PATCHBOX C36UTPXC6XXX1G PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet (155 mm vs 50 mm). The PATCHBOX C36UTPXC6XXX1G PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet has 620 mm more depth than the TP-Link Omada PoE++ Injector Adapter (690 mm vs 70 mm). Cabling technology: 10/100 on the PATCHBOX C36UTPXC6XXX1G PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet, 10/100/1000 on the TP-Link Omada PoE++ Injector Adapter. Cable types supported: Cat6 on the PATCHBOX C36UTPXC6XXX1G PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet, Cat3, Cat4, Cat5, Cat5e, Cat6 on the TP-Link Omada PoE++ Injector Adapter.

• Cabling technology
  • C36UTPXC6XXX1G PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:10/100
  • Omada PoE++ Injector Adapter:10/100/1000
• Operating temperature (T-T)
  • C36UTPXC6XXX1G PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:10 - 45 °C
  • Omada PoE++ Injector Adapter:0 - 45 °C
• Operating relative humidity (H-H)
  • C36UTPXC6XXX1G PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:10 - 95%
  • Omada PoE++ Injector Adapter:10 - 90%
• Width
  • C36UTPXC6XXX1G PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:50 mm
  • Omada PoE++ Injector Adapter:155 mm
• Depth
  • C36UTPXC6XXX1G PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:690 mm
  • Omada PoE++ Injector Adapter:70 mm
• Height
  • C36UTPXC6XXX1G PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:50 mm
  • Omada PoE++ Injector Adapter:42 mm