Product comparison · 2 poe adapters

Cudy POE220 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet vs TP-Link Omada PoE+ Injector Adapter

Add a product
  • 25specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 13identical
  • 15known for one product only

Key differences

The Cudy POE220 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet has 2 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the TP-Link Omada PoE+ Injector Adapter (4 vs 2). The Cudy POE220 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet has 1 more RJ-45 input ports than the TP-Link Omada PoE+ Injector Adapter (2 vs 1). The Cudy POE220 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet has 1 more RJ-45 output ports than the TP-Link Omada PoE+ Injector Adapter (2 vs 1). AC adapter frequency: 50 - 60 Hz on the Cudy POE220 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet, 50/60 Hz on the TP-Link Omada PoE+ Injector Adapter. Operating temperature (T-T): -40 - 40 °C on the Cudy POE220 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet, 0 - 40 °C on the TP-Link Omada PoE+ Injector Adapter.

  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • POE220 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:4
    • Omada PoE+ Injector Adapter:2
  • RJ-45 input ports
    • POE220 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:2
    • Omada PoE+ Injector Adapter:1
  • RJ-45 output ports
    • POE220 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:2
    • Omada PoE+ Injector Adapter:1
  • AC adapter frequency
    • POE220 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:50 - 60 Hz
    • Omada PoE+ Injector Adapter:50/60 Hz
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • POE220 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:-40 - 40 °C
    • Omada PoE+ Injector Adapter:0 - 40 °C
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • POE220 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:10 - 85%
    • Omada PoE+ Injector Adapter:10 - 90%
  • Storage temperature (T-T)
    • POE220 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:-40 - 50 °C
    • Omada PoE+ Injector Adapter:-40 - 70 °C
  • Storage relative humidity (H-H)
    • POE220 PoE adapter Gigabit Ethernet:10 - 90%
    • Omada PoE+ Injector Adapter:5 - 90%

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of POE220, POE160S
40 specifications
Network1 differ
Cabling technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10/100/1000
Cable types supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCat3, Cat4, Cat5, Cat5e
Networking standardsDiffersIEEE 802.3af, IEEE 802.3atIEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3af, IEEE 802.3at, IEEE 802.3i, IEEE 802.3u
Featuresidentical
Maximum operating distanceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100 m
Easy to installKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Pin assignment & polarityKnown for one1/2 (-), 3/6 (+)Unknown — not stated by the source
Power protection featuresKnown for oneOver current, Over voltage, OverloadUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces3 differ
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers42
RJ-45 input portsDiffers21
RJ-45 output portsDiffers21
Power1 differ
AC adapter frequencyDiffers50 - 60 Hz50/60 Hz
Power over Ethernet (PoE) voltageKnown for one54 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Input currentKnown for one0.5 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Power over Ethernet (PoE) power per portKnown for one30 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Total Power over Ethernet (PoE) budgetKnown for one60 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions4 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs-40 - 40 °C0 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs10 - 85%10 - 90%
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs-40 - 50 °C-40 - 70 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Differs10 - 90%5 - 90%
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers131 mm125 mm
DepthDiffers70 mm59.4 mm
HeightDiffers40 mm36.8 mm
Packaging contentidentical
Wall mounting kitKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source170 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source230 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source80 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source460 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More poe adapter comparisons

All poe adapter comparisons