Bouncepad PoE Texas vs TP-Link Omada PoE++ Injector Adapter

Key differences

The TP-Link Omada PoE++ Injector Adapter has 10 mm more width than the Bouncepad PoE Texas (155 mm vs 145 mm). The Bouncepad PoE Texas has 15 mm more depth than the TP-Link Omada PoE++ Injector Adapter (85 mm vs 70 mm). The TP-Link Omada PoE++ Injector Adapter has 7 mm more height than the Bouncepad PoE Texas (42 mm vs 35 mm). Housing material: Aluminium, Metal on the Bouncepad PoE Texas, Metal on the TP-Link Omada PoE++ Injector Adapter. Package weight: 1.4 kg on the Bouncepad PoE Texas, 920 g on the TP-Link Omada PoE++ Injector Adapter.

• Housing material
  • PoE Texas:Aluminium, Metal
  • Omada PoE++ Injector Adapter:Metal
• Width
  • PoE Texas:145 mm
  • Omada PoE++ Injector Adapter:155 mm
• Depth
  • PoE Texas:85 mm
  • Omada PoE++ Injector Adapter:70 mm
• Height
  • PoE Texas:35 mm
  • Omada PoE++ Injector Adapter:42 mm
• Package width
  • PoE Texas:145 mm
  • Omada PoE++ Injector Adapter:190 mm
• Package depth
  • PoE Texas:85 mm
  • Omada PoE++ Injector Adapter:250 mm
• Package height
  • PoE Texas:35 mm
  • Omada PoE++ Injector Adapter:95 mm
• Package weight
  • PoE Texas:1.4 kg
  • Omada PoE++ Injector Adapter:920 g