Product comparison · 2 network transceiver modules

D-Link DEM-211 network transceiver module Fiber optic 100 Mbit/s SFP 1310 nm vs D-Link SFP 10/100/1000 BASE-T Copper Transceiver

38specifications compared
14differ
24identical
16known for one product only

Key differences

SFP transceiver type
- DEM-211 network transceiver module Fiber optic 100 Mbit/s SFP 1310 nm:Fiber optic
- SFP 10/100/1000 BASE-T Copper Transceiver:Copper
Maximum data transfer rate
- DEM-211 network transceiver module Fiber optic 100 Mbit/s SFP 1310 nm:100 Mbit/s
- SFP 10/100/1000 BASE-T Copper Transceiver:1000 Mbit/s
Maximum transfer distance
- DEM-211 network transceiver module Fiber optic 100 Mbit/s SFP 1310 nm:2000 m
- SFP 10/100/1000 BASE-T Copper Transceiver:100 m
Safety
- DEM-211 network transceiver module Fiber optic 100 Mbit/s SFP 1310 nm:FDA/CDRH, TUV, UL
- SFP 10/100/1000 BASE-T Copper Transceiver:CSA, TUV
Operating temperature (T-T)
- DEM-211 network transceiver module Fiber optic 100 Mbit/s SFP 1310 nm:0 - 70 °C
- SFP 10/100/1000 BASE-T Copper Transceiver:0 - 85 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)
- DEM-211 network transceiver module Fiber optic 100 Mbit/s SFP 1310 nm:10 - 90%
- SFP 10/100/1000 BASE-T Copper Transceiver:0 - 80%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)
- DEM-211 network transceiver module Fiber optic 100 Mbit/s SFP 1310 nm:5 - 90%
- SFP 10/100/1000 BASE-T Copper Transceiver:0 - 80%
Width
- DEM-211 network transceiver module Fiber optic 100 Mbit/s SFP 1310 nm:57.9 mm
- SFP 10/100/1000 BASE-T Copper Transceiver:13.7 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of DEM-211, DGS-712
54 specifications	A D-Link DEM-211 network transceiver module Fiber optic 100 Mbit/s SFP 1310 nm Model DEM-211 View product	B D-Link SFP 10/100/1000 BASE-T Copper Transceiver Model DGS-712 View product
Performance4 differ
SFP transceiver typeDiffers	Fiber optic	Copper
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers	100 Mbit/s	1000 Mbit/s
Multi-mode fiber (MMF) supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Fiber optic connectorKnown for one	LC	Unknown — not stated by the source
Fiber cable diameters supported (core/cladding)Known for one	50/125,62.5/125 µm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum transfer distanceDiffers	2000 m	100 m
WavelengthKnown for one	1310 nm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Link budgetKnown for one	13 dB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cabling technologyKnown for one	100Base-FX	Unknown — not stated by the source
Networking standardsDiffers	IEEE 802.3u	IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3z
Fiber ethernet cabling technologyKnown for one	100BASE	Unknown — not stated by the source
Duplex systemKnown for one	Full, Half	Unknown — not stated by the source
SFP transceiver standardKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	T, TX
Ethernet LANKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ethernet interface typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Gigabit Ethernet
Copper ethernet cabling technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10BASE, 100BASE, 1000BASE
Featuresidentical
Form factorKnown for one	Plug-in	Unknown — not stated by the source
Hot-swapKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Compatible productsKnown for one	DES-1228, DES-1228P, DES-3252P, DES-3228PA, DES-1252, DGS-3612G	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5617000 h
Certificates2 differ
SafetyDiffers	FDA/CDRH, TUV, UL	CSA, TUV
CertificationDiffers	RoHS	FCC Class A CE Class A VCCI Class A
Operational conditions3 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	0 - 70 °C	0 - 85 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs	10 - 90%	0 - 80%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Differs	5 - 90%	0 - 80%
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	57.9 mm	13.7 mm
DepthDiffers	12.7 mm	70.2 mm
HeightDiffers	7.62 mm	13.4 mm
WeightDiffers	13.6 g	20 g
Logistics data1 differ
Harmonized System (HS) codeDiffers	85369010	85176990

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network transceiver module comparisons

All network transceiver module comparisons