Product comparison · 2 network transceiver modules

ATGBICS 6GK6000-8FG53-0AA0-C network transceiver module Fiber optic 1000 Mbit/s SFP 850 nm vs Legrand GLC-BX-U-A network transceiver module Fiber optic SFP 1310 nm

10specifications compared
4differ
6identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

The Legrand GLC-BX-U-A network transceiver module Fiber optic SFP 1310 nm has 19,500 m more maximum transfer distance than the ATGBICS 6GK6000-8FG53-0AA0-C network transceiver module Fiber optic 1000 Mbit/s SFP 850 nm (20000 m vs 500 m). The Legrand GLC-BX-U-A network transceiver module Fiber optic SFP 1310 nm has 460 nm more wavelength than the ATGBICS 6GK6000-8FG53-0AA0-C network transceiver module Fiber optic 1000 Mbit/s SFP 850 nm (1310 nm vs 850 nm). Brand compatibility: Siemens on the ATGBICS 6GK6000-8FG53-0AA0-C network transceiver module Fiber optic 1000 Mbit/s SFP 850 nm, Cisco on the Legrand GLC-BX-U-A network transceiver module Fiber optic SFP 1310 nm.

Maximum transfer distance
- 6GK6000-8FG53-0AA0-C network transceiver module Fiber optic 1000 Mbit/s SFP 850 nm:500 m
- GLC-BX-U-A network transceiver module Fiber optic SFP 1310 nm:20000 m
Wavelength
- 6GK6000-8FG53-0AA0-C network transceiver module Fiber optic 1000 Mbit/s SFP 850 nm:850 nm
- GLC-BX-U-A network transceiver module Fiber optic SFP 1310 nm:1310 nm
Brand compatibility
- 6GK6000-8FG53-0AA0-C network transceiver module Fiber optic 1000 Mbit/s SFP 850 nm:Siemens
- GLC-BX-U-A network transceiver module Fiber optic SFP 1310 nm:Cisco

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 6GK6000-8FG53-0AA0-C, GLC-BX-U-A
28 specifications	A ATGBICS 6GK6000-8FG53-0AA0-C network transceiver module Fiber optic 1000 Mbit/s SFP 850 nm Model 6GK6000-8FG53-0AA0-C View product	B Legrand GLC-BX-U-A network transceiver module Fiber optic SFP 1310 nm Model GLC-BX-U-A View product
Performance2 differ
SFP transceiver type	Fiber optic	Fiber optic
Maximum data transfer rateKnown for one	1000 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Interface type	SFP	SFP
Multi-mode fiber (MMF) supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Fiber optic connector	LC	LC
SFP transceiver standardKnown for one	SX	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum transfer distanceDiffers	500 m	20000 m
WavelengthDiffers	850 nm	1310 nm
Ethernet LANKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet interface typeKnown for one	Gigabit Ethernet	Unknown — not stated by the source
Fiber ethernet cabling technologyKnown for one	1000BASE	Unknown — not stated by the source
Duplex systemKnown for one	Full	Unknown — not stated by the source
Single-mode fiber (SMF) supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Tx wavelength (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1310 nm
Rx wavelength (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1490 nm
Digital Diagnostics Monitoring (DDM)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Features1 differ
Product colour	Silver	Silver
Form factorKnown for one	SFP	Unknown — not stated by the source
Hot-Plug supportKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Hot-swapKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Easy to installKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Brand compatibilityDiffers	Siemens	Cisco
Certificates1 differ
Compliance certificatesDiffers	CE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), REACH, RoHS, Trade Agreements Act (TAA), UL	CE, RoHS
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)	-40 - 85 °C	-40 - 85 °C
Minimum operating temperatureKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-40 °C
Maximum operating temperatureKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	85 °C
Logistics dataidentical
Country of origin	China	China
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network transceiver module comparisons

All network transceiver module comparisons