Product comparison · 2 network switches

NETGEAR FSM7328PS Managed L3 Power over Ethernet (PoE) vs NETGEAR Prosafe JGS524F

20specifications compared
14differ
6identical
15known for one product only

Key differences

Switch type
- FSM7328PS Managed L3 Power over Ethernet (PoE):Managed
- Prosafe JGS524F:Unmanaged
SFP module slots quantity
- FSM7328PS Managed L3 Power over Ethernet (PoE):4
- Prosafe JGS524F:2
SFP/SFP+ slots quantity
- FSM7328PS Managed L3 Power over Ethernet (PoE):4
- Prosafe JGS524F:2
MAC address table
- FSM7328PS Managed L3 Power over Ethernet (PoE):16384 entries
- Prosafe JGS524F:8000 entries
Packet buffer memory
- FSM7328PS Managed L3 Power over Ethernet (PoE):32 MB
- Prosafe JGS524F:2 MB
Mean time between failures (MTBF)
- FSM7328PS Managed L3 Power over Ethernet (PoE):125500 h
- Prosafe JGS524F:87600 h
Power consumption (typical)
- FSM7328PS Managed L3 Power over Ethernet (PoE):80 W
- Prosafe JGS524F:40 W
Power over Ethernet (PoE)
- FSM7328PS Managed L3 Power over Ethernet (PoE):Yes
- Prosafe JGS524F:No

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of FSM7328PS, Prosafe JGS524F
35 specifications	A NETGEAR FSM7328PS Managed L3 Power over Ethernet (PoE) Model FSM7328PS View product	B NETGEAR Prosafe JGS524F View product
Management features1 differ
Switch typeDiffers	Managed	Unmanaged
Switch layerKnown for one	L3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantity	24	24
Gigabit Ethernet (copper) ports quantityKnown for one	4	Unknown — not stated by the source
SFP module slots quantityDiffers	4	2
SFP/SFP+ slots quantityDiffers	4	2
Console portKnown for one	RS-232	Unknown — not stated by the source
Network1 differ
Networking standardsDiffers	IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3x, IEEE 802.3z	IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3i, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3X, IEEE 802.3z
Copper ethernet cabling technology	1000BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, 10BASE-T	1000BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, 10BASE-T
Full duplexKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Flow control supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Data transmission2 differ
MAC address tableDiffers	16384 entries	8000 entries
Switching capacityKnown for one	12.8 Gbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum data transfer rate	1 Gbit/s	1 Gbit/s
Packet buffer memoryDiffers	32 MB	2 MB
Protocolsidentical
Data link protocolsKnown for one	Ethernet, Fast Ethernet, Gigabit Ethernet	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performance1 differ
Internal memoryKnown for one	128 MB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs	125500 h	87600 h
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	80 W	40 W
Power over Ethernet (PoE)1 differ
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Differs	Yes	No
Other features2 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	440 x 205 x 43 mm	330 x 107 x 43 mm
Connectivity technology	Wired	Wired
Power requirementsDiffers	100-240VAC/50-60 Hz	100 - 240 V, 50 - 60 Hz
LatencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 µs
BandwidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	48 Gbit/s
Networking featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Gigabit Ethernet
Electromagnetic emissionsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE mark, FCC Part 15 Class A, VCCI Class A, EN 55022 (CISPR 22), Class A, EN 50082-1, EN 55024, C-Tick
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)	0 - 40 °C	0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)	-20 - 70 °C	-20 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs	10 - 90%	0 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Differs	5 - 95%	10 - 95%
Operating altitudeKnown for one	0 - 3000 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	3.2 kg	2.4 kg
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for one	CE; CSA (CSA 22.2 #950); UL (UL 1950)/CUL IEC950/EN60950	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
SafetyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	UL (UL 1950)/cUL, IEC950/EN60950

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network switch comparisons

All network switch comparisons