Product comparison · 2 network switches

NETGEAR FS605 Unmanaged vs NETGEAR ProSafe™ 48 Port Gigabit L2 Managed Switch

Add a product
  • 7specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 1identical
  • 23known for one product only

Key differences

  • Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantity
    • FS605 Unmanaged:5
    • ProSafe™ 48 Port Gigabit L2 Managed Switch:48
  • MAC address table
    • FS605 Unmanaged:1000 entries
    • ProSafe™ 48 Port Gigabit L2 Managed Switch:8000 entries
  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • FS605 Unmanaged:0.1 Gbit/s
    • ProSafe™ 48 Port Gigabit L2 Managed Switch:1 Gbit/s
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • FS605 Unmanaged:7.5 W
    • ProSafe™ 48 Port Gigabit L2 Managed Switch:90 W
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • FS605 Unmanaged:116.57 x 89.75 x 34.42 mm
    • ProSafe™ 48 Port Gigabit L2 Managed Switch:440 x 257 x 43 mm
  • Weight
    • FS605 Unmanaged:130 g
    • ProSafe™ 48 Port Gigabit L2 Managed Switch:4.2 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of FS605, ProSafe™ 48 Port Gigabit L2 Managed Switch
30 specifications
A

NETGEAR

FS605 Unmanaged

Model FS605

View product
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantityDiffers548
Networkidentical
Networking standardsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3x
Copper ethernet cabling technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1000BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, 10BASE-T
Full duplexKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Data transmission2 differ
MAC address tableDiffers1000 entries8000 entries
Switching capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source96 Gbit/s
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers0.1 Gbit/s1 Gbit/s
Packet buffer memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.122 MB
Protocolsidentical
Data link protocolsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceEthernet/ Fast Ethernet/ Gigabit Ethernet
Designidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLink
SafetyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE mark, commercial; CSA certified (CSA 22.2 #950); UL listed (UL 1950)/CUL IEC950/EN60950
StackableKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Internal memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source64 MB
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source57800 h
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs7.5 W90 W
Other features1 differ
LatencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20µs for 64-byte frames
Data transfer rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1000 Mbit/s
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs116.57 x 89.75 x 34.42 mm440 x 257 x 43 mm
Power requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100-240VAC/50-60 Hz
Acoustic pressure emissionsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source47 dB
Electromagnetic emissionsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE mark, commercial; FCC Part 15 Class A; VCCI Class A-EN 55022 (CISPR 22), Class A; C-Tick
I/O portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-48 RJ-45 connectors for 10BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, and 1000BASE-T (Auto Uplink and auto-negotiate on all ports) -4 SFP connectors for fiber connection (shared with the last four copper ports) - RS-232 Console Port
Connectivity technologyKnown for oneWiredUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)0 - 40 °C0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-20 - 70 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source95
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one10 - 90%Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers130 g4.2 kg
Management featuresidentical
Switch typeKnown for oneUnmanagedUnknown — not stated by the source
Power over Ethernet (PoE)identical
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network switch comparisons

All network switch comparisons