Product comparison · 2 network switches

D-Link 26-port Managed Layer 2 Workgroup Switch vs NETGEAR ProSafe™ 48 Port 10/100 L2 Managed Stackable Switch with 2 Gigabit ports

7specifications compared
6differ
1identical
19known for one product only

Key differences

Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantity
- 26-port Managed Layer 2 Workgroup Switch:26
- ProSafe™ 48 Port 10/100 L2 Managed Stackable Switch with 2 Gigabit ports:50
Maximum data transfer rate
- 26-port Managed Layer 2 Workgroup Switch:0.1 Gbit/s
- ProSafe™ 48 Port 10/100 L2 Managed Stackable Switch with 2 Gigabit ports:1 Gbit/s
Data transfer rate
- 26-port Managed Layer 2 Workgroup Switch:100 Mbit/s
- ProSafe™ 48 Port 10/100 L2 Managed Stackable Switch with 2 Gigabit ports:1000 Mbit/s

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 26-port Managed Layer 2 Workgroup Switch, ProSafe™ 48 Port 10/100 L2 Managed Stackable Switch with 2 Gigabit ports
26 specifications	A D-Link 26-port Managed Layer 2 Workgroup Switch View product	B NETGEAR ProSafe™ 48 Port 10/100 L2 Managed Stackable Switch with 2 Gigabit ports View product
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantityDiffers	26	50
Network2 differ
Networking standardsDiffers	IEEE 802.1p, IEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.3ad, IEEE 802.3u	IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3i, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3x
Copper ethernet cabling technologyDiffers	100Base-TX, 10Base-T	1000BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, 10BASE-T
Full duplex	Yes	Yes
Data transmission1 differ
MAC address tableKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8000 entries
Switching capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 Gbit/s
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers	0.1 Gbit/s	1 Gbit/s
Protocolsidentical
Data link protocolsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Ethernet, Fast Ethernet, Gigibit Ethernet
Management protocolsKnown for one	SNMP v.1, v.2c, v.3, RMON (1,2,3,9), Telnet	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
SafetyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE mark, commercial; CSA certified (CSA 22.2 #950); TUV licensed (EN 60 950); UL listed (UL 1950)/cUL IEC950/EN60950
Performanceidentical
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	54481 h
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	47 W
Other features2 differ
LatencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	80 microseconds for 64-byte frames
Data transfer rateDiffers	100 Mbit/s	1000 Mbit/s
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	440 x 260 x 86 mm
Power requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 - 127/200 - 240 VAC, 50-60 Hz
Electromagnetic emissionsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE mark, commercial, FCC Part 15 Class A, VCCI Class A, EN 55022 (CISPR 22), Class A, C-Tick
I/O portsDiffers	24x 10/100 Ethernet 1x RS-232 Console 1x Power	• 48 RJ-45 connectors for 10BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, and 1000BASE-T (Auto Uplink on all ports) • Two RJ-45 connectors for 10BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, and 1000BASE-T (Auto Uplink on all ports) • Gigabit Interface Converter (GBIC) slots for GBIC modules • RS-232 Console Port
Management platformKnown for one	Web-based, CLI	Unknown — not stated by the source
Connectivity technologyKnown for one	Wired	Unknown — not stated by the source
Authentication methodKnown for one	RADIUS, 802.1x	Unknown — not stated by the source
Networking featuresKnown for one	Ethernet, Fast Ethernet	Unknown — not stated by the source
Expansion slotsKnown for one	2x Mini GBIC	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-20 - 70 °C
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.5 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network switch comparisons

All network switch comparisons