Product comparison · 2 network switches

Allied Telesis 10/100/1000T x 48 ports Managed Ethernet Layer 3 Switch w/ 4 combo SFP bays vs Zyxel ES-3124PWR Managed L2+ Fast Ethernet Switch

Add a product
  • 17specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 7identical
  • 24known for one product only

Key differences

The Allied Telesis 10/100/1000T x 48 ports Managed Ethernet Layer 3 Switch w/ 4 combo SFP bays has 24 more basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantity than the Zyxel ES-3124PWR Managed L2+ Fast Ethernet Switch (48 vs 24). The Allied Telesis 10/100/1000T x 48 ports Managed Ethernet Layer 3 Switch w/ 4 combo SFP bays has 70 W more power consumption (typical) than the Zyxel ES-3124PWR Managed L2+ Fast Ethernet Switch (120 W vs 50 W). The Zyxel ES-3124PWR Managed L2+ Fast Ethernet Switch has 5 - 90% more operating relative humidity (H-H) than the Allied Telesis 10/100/1000T x 48 ports Managed Ethernet Layer 3 Switch w/ 4 combo SFP bays (10 - 90% vs 5 - 90%). Only the Zyxel ES-3124PWR Managed L2+ Fast Ethernet Switch has power over Ethernet (PoE). Switch layer: L3 on the Allied Telesis 10/100/1000T x 48 ports Managed Ethernet Layer 3 Switch w/ 4 combo SFP bays, L2 on the Zyxel ES-3124PWR Managed L2+ Fast Ethernet Switch.

  • Switch layer
    • 10/100/1000T x 48 ports Managed Ethernet Layer 3 Switch w/ 4 combo SFP bays:L3
    • ES-3124PWR Managed L2+ Fast Ethernet Switch:L2
  • Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantity
    • 10/100/1000T x 48 ports Managed Ethernet Layer 3 Switch w/ 4 combo SFP bays:48
    • ES-3124PWR Managed L2+ Fast Ethernet Switch:24
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • 10/100/1000T x 48 ports Managed Ethernet Layer 3 Switch w/ 4 combo SFP bays:120 W
    • ES-3124PWR Managed L2+ Fast Ethernet Switch:50 W
  • Power over Ethernet (PoE)
    • 10/100/1000T x 48 ports Managed Ethernet Layer 3 Switch w/ 4 combo SFP bays:No
    • ES-3124PWR Managed L2+ Fast Ethernet Switch:Yes
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • 10/100/1000T x 48 ports Managed Ethernet Layer 3 Switch w/ 4 combo SFP bays:438 x 304 x 44 mm
    • ES-3124PWR Managed L2+ Fast Ethernet Switch:438 x 420 x 44.45 mm
  • Power requirements
    • 10/100/1000T x 48 ports Managed Ethernet Layer 3 Switch w/ 4 combo SFP bays:100-240vAC, 50-60Hz
    • ES-3124PWR Managed L2+ Fast Ethernet Switch:100-240VAC, 50/60Hz
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • 10/100/1000T x 48 ports Managed Ethernet Layer 3 Switch w/ 4 combo SFP bays:0 - 40 °C
    • ES-3124PWR Managed L2+ Fast Ethernet Switch:0 - 45 °C
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • 10/100/1000T x 48 ports Managed Ethernet Layer 3 Switch w/ 4 combo SFP bays:5 - 90%
    • ES-3124PWR Managed L2+ Fast Ethernet Switch:10 - 90%

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 10/100/1000T x 48 ports Managed Ethernet Layer 3 Switch w/ 4 combo SFP bays, ES-3124PWR Managed L2+ Fast Ethernet Switch
41 specifications
Management features1 differ
Switch layerDiffersL3L2
Quality of Service (QoS) supportKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Basic switching RJ-45 Ethernet ports quantityDiffers4824
Combo SFP ports quantityKnown for one4Unknown — not stated by the source
SFP/SFP+ slots quantityKnown for one4Unknown — not stated by the source
Network1 differ
Networking standardsDiffersIEEE 802.1D, IEEE 802.1p, IEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.1s, IEEE 802.1w, IEEE 802.1x, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3ac, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3x, IEEE 802.3zIEEE 802.1d, IEEE 802.1p, IEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.1w, IEEE 802.1x, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ad, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3x, IEEE 802.3z
IP routingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Broadcast storm controlKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Port mirroringKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Data transmissionidentical
ThroughputKnown for one71.424 MppsUnknown — not stated by the source
Securityidentical
DHCP featuresKnown for oneDHCP clientUnknown — not stated by the source
MAC address filteringKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Protocolsidentical
Management protocolsKnown for oneSNMP, RMON, IGMP, TelnetUnknown — not stated by the source
Switching protocolsKnown for oneEthernetUnknown — not stated by the source
Data link protocolsKnown for oneEthernet, Fast Ethernet, Gigabit EthernetUnknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Built-in processorKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Processor modelKnown for onePowerPCUnknown — not stated by the source
Processor frequencyKnown for one200 MHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Internal memoryKnown for one32 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Flash memoryKnown for one16 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one250000 hUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs120 W50 W
Power over Ethernet (PoE)1 differ
Power over Ethernet (PoE)DiffersNoYes
Other features2 differ
Data transfer rateKnown for one1000 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs438 x 304 x 44 mm438 x 420 x 44.45 mm
Connectivity technologyKnown for oneWiredUnknown — not stated by the source
Packet transfer speedKnown for one14880-1488000 ppsUnknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsDiffers100-240vAC, 50-60Hz100-240VAC, 50/60Hz
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 40 °C0 - 45 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs5 - 90%10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 95%Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers4.61 kg6.8 kg
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for oneFCC Class A certified, C-Tick, EN 61000-3-2, VCCI Class A ITE, EN 61000-3-3, EN55024, EN55022 Class A, FCC Part 15, AS/NZS 3548, IEC 825-2, UL 60950-1, EN 60950-1, CSA C22.2 No. 60950-1-03Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
StackableKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network switch comparisons

All network switch comparisons