Product comparison · 2 network media converters

TP-Link MC100CM(UN) network media converter 100 Mbit/s 1310 nm Multi-mode Black vs TP-Link MC112CS(UN) network media converter 100 Mbit/s Single-mode Black

Add a product
  • 25specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 20identical
  • 4known for one product only

Key differences

  • Cable types supported
    • MC100CM(UN) network media converter 100 Mbit/s 1310 nm Multi-mode Black:Cat3, Cat4, Cat5, Cat5e
    • MC112CS(UN) network media converter 100 Mbit/s Single-mode Black:Cat3, Cat4, Cat5
  • Maximum transfer distance
    • MC100CM(UN) network media converter 100 Mbit/s 1310 nm Multi-mode Black:2000 m
    • MC112CS(UN) network media converter 100 Mbit/s Single-mode Black:20000 m
  • Fiber mode structure
    • MC100CM(UN) network media converter 100 Mbit/s 1310 nm Multi-mode Black:Multi-mode
    • MC112CS(UN) network media converter 100 Mbit/s Single-mode Black:Single-mode
  • Power consumption (max)
    • MC100CM(UN) network media converter 100 Mbit/s 1310 nm Multi-mode Black:2.4 W
    • MC112CS(UN) network media converter 100 Mbit/s Single-mode Black:2.41 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of MC100CM(UN), MC112CS(UN)
29 specifications
Network2 differ
Networking standardsDiffersIEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3xIEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3u
Cable types supportedDiffersCat3, Cat4, Cat5, Cat5eCat3, Cat4, Cat5
Copper ethernet cabling technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10BASE-TX, 100BASE-FX, 100BASE-TX
Performance2 differ
Maximum transfer distanceDiffers2000 m20000 m
WavelengthKnown for one1310 nmUnknown — not stated by the source
Fiber mode structureDiffersMulti-modeSingle-mode
Wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power1 differ
Power consumption (max)Differs2.4 W2.41 W
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network media converter comparisons

All network media converter comparisons