Product comparison · 2 network extenders

TP-Link RE200 V5 vs TP-Link AC1200 Mesh Wi-Fi Extender

20specifications compared
9differ
11identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

The TP-Link AC1200 Mesh Wi-Fi Extender has 434 Mbit/s more data transfer rate than the TP-Link RE200 V5 (867 Mbit/s vs 433 Mbit/s). The TP-Link RE200 V5 has 1 more antennas quantity than the TP-Link AC1200 Mesh Wi-Fi Extender (3 vs 2). The TP-Link AC1200 Mesh Wi-Fi Extender has 434 Mbit/s more Wi-Fi data rate (max) than the TP-Link RE200 V5 (867 Mbit/s vs 433 Mbit/s). LED indicators: Power, WLAN on the TP-Link RE200 V5, Yes on the TP-Link AC1200 Mesh Wi-Fi Extender.

Data transfer rate
- RE200 V5:433 Mbit/s
- AC1200 Mesh Wi-Fi Extender:867 Mbit/s
Antennas quantity
- RE200 V5:3
- AC1200 Mesh Wi-Fi Extender:2
Wi-Fi data rate (max)
- RE200 V5:433 Mbit/s
- AC1200 Mesh Wi-Fi Extender:867 Mbit/s
LED indicators
- RE200 V5:Power, WLAN
- AC1200 Mesh Wi-Fi Extender:Yes
Power consumption (typical)
- RE200 V5:7.3 W
- AC1200 Mesh Wi-Fi Extender:9.5 W
Width
- RE200 V5:65.8 mm
- AC1200 Mesh Wi-Fi Extender:69.5 mm
Depth
- RE200 V5:38.8 mm
- AC1200 Mesh Wi-Fi Extender:35 mm
Height
- RE200 V5:110 mm
- AC1200 Mesh Wi-Fi Extender:124.1 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of RE200 V5, RE330
38 specifications	A TP-Link RE200 V5 View product	B TP-Link AC1200 Mesh Wi-Fi Extender Model RE330 View product
Performance1 differ
Data transfer rateDiffers	433 Mbit/s	867 Mbit/s
WPS push buttonKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Windows 10, Windows 2000, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows 98SE, Windows NT, Windows Vista, Windows XP	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mac compatibilityKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Browser supportedKnown for one	Internet Explorer 11, Firefox 12.0, Chrome 20.0, Safari 4.0, or other Java-enabled browser	Unknown — not stated by the source
Antenna1 differ
Antennas quantityDiffers	3	2
Transmitting power (FCC)Known for one	30 dBm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Network2 differ
Wi-Fi data rate (max)Differs	433 Mbit/s	867 Mbit/s
DHCP serverKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Security algorithmsDiffers	WEP, WPA-PSK, WPA2-PSK	64-bit WEP, 128-bit WEP, WPA-PSK, WPA2-PSK
Web-based managementKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Wi-Fi Multimedia (WMM)/(WME)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Host interfaceKnown for one	RJ-45	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
LED indicatorsDiffers	Power, WLAN	Yes
Reset buttonKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	7.3 W	9.5 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	0 - 40 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	10 - 90%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	65.8 mm	69.5 mm
DepthDiffers	38.8 mm	35 mm
HeightDiffers	110 mm	124.1 mm
Packaging contentidentical
Quick start guideKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
ManualKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Packaging dataidentical
Package typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Box
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	85176990

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network extender comparisons

All network extender comparisons