Product comparison · 2 network extenders

TP-Link Deco M3W vs TP-Link AC750 Mesh Wi-Fi Range Extender

19specifications compared
10differ
9identical
19known for one product only

Key differences

The TP-Link Deco M3W has 434 Mbit/s more data transfer rate than the TP-Link AC750 Mesh Wi-Fi Range Extender (867 Mbit/s vs 433 Mbit/s). The TP-Link Deco M3W has 734 Mbit/s more Wi-Fi data rate (max) than the TP-Link AC750 Mesh Wi-Fi Range Extender (1167 Mbit/s vs 433 Mbit/s). The TP-Link Deco M3W has 35 mm more width than the TP-Link AC750 Mesh Wi-Fi Range Extender (124 mm vs 89 mm). Type: Network transmitter on the TP-Link Deco M3W, Network repeater on the TP-Link AC750 Mesh Wi-Fi Range Extender. Antenna type: Internal on the TP-Link Deco M3W, External on the TP-Link AC750 Mesh Wi-Fi Range Extender.

Type
- Deco M3W:Network transmitter
- AC750 Mesh Wi-Fi Range Extender:Network repeater
Data transfer rate
- Deco M3W:867 Mbit/s
- AC750 Mesh Wi-Fi Range Extender:433 Mbit/s
Antenna type
- Deco M3W:Internal
- AC750 Mesh Wi-Fi Range Extender:External
Wi-Fi data rate (max)
- Deco M3W:1167 Mbit/s
- AC750 Mesh Wi-Fi Range Extender:433 Mbit/s
Width
- Deco M3W:124 mm
- AC750 Mesh Wi-Fi Range Extender:89 mm
Depth
- Deco M3W:69 mm
- AC750 Mesh Wi-Fi Range Extender:35 mm
Height
- Deco M3W:35 mm
- AC750 Mesh Wi-Fi Range Extender:124.1 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Deco M3W, RE215
38 specifications	A TP-Link Deco M3W View product	B TP-Link AC750 Mesh Wi-Fi Range Extender Model RE215 View product
Performance2 differ
TypeDiffers	Network transmitter	Network repeater
Data transfer rateDiffers	867 Mbit/s	433 Mbit/s
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10,100 Mbit/s
WPS push buttonKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Antenna1 differ
Antenna typeDiffers	Internal	External
Transmit power rangeKnown for one	20 - 30 dBmW	Unknown — not stated by the source
Network3 differ
Networking standardsDiffers	IEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11ac, IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11k, IEEE 802.11n, IEEE 802.11r, IEEE 802.11v	IEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11ac, IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11n
Wi-Fi data rate (max)Differs	1167 Mbit/s	433 Mbit/s
Quality of Service (QoS) supportKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Security algorithmsDiffers	WPA-PSK, WPA2-PSK	64-bit WEP, 128-bit WEP, WPA-PSK, WPA2-PSK
Cabling technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10/100Base-T(X)
Wi-Fi bandKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Dual-band (2.4 GHz / 5 GHz)
Design1 differ
CertificationDiffers	CE, FCC, IC, NCC, BSMI, IDA, RCM, JPA, JRF, VCCI, KC	CE, RoHS
Quantity per packKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 pc(s)
Poweridentical
Input currentKnown for one	0.3 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	9.5 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	0 - 40 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-40 - 70 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	10 - 90%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	5 - 90%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	124 mm	89 mm
DepthDiffers	69 mm	35 mm
HeightDiffers	35 mm	124.1 mm
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Quick start guideKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
Internal memoryKnown for one	128 MB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Flash memoryKnown for one	8 MB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	RoHS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network extender comparisons

All network extender comparisons