Product comparison · 2 network antennas

D-Link ANT50-2000N network antenna Directional antenna 20 dBi vs Zebra Motorola ML-2499-HPA8-01 network antenna Omni-directional antenna N-type 8 dBi

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 1identical
  • 16known for one product only

Key differences

The D-Link ANT50-2000N network antenna Directional antenna 20 dBi has 12 dBi more antenna gain level (max) than the Zebra Motorola ML-2499-HPA8-01 network antenna Omni-directional antenna N-type 8 dBi (20 dBi vs 8 dBi). Frequency band: 5.15 - 5.875 GHz on the D-Link ANT50-2000N network antenna Directional antenna 20 dBi, 2.4 - 2.5 GHz on the Zebra Motorola ML-2499-HPA8-01 network antenna Omni-directional antenna N-type 8 dBi. Antenna type: Directional antenna on the D-Link ANT50-2000N network antenna Directional antenna 20 dBi, Omni-directional antenna on the Zebra Motorola ML-2499-HPA8-01 network antenna Omni-directional antenna N-type 8 dBi. Polarization: Dual polarization on the D-Link ANT50-2000N network antenna Directional antenna 20 dBi, Vertical polarization on the Zebra Motorola ML-2499-HPA8-01 network antenna Omni-directional antenna N-type 8 dBi. Weight: 1.32 kg on the D-Link ANT50-2000N network antenna Directional antenna 20 dBi, 204 g on the Zebra Motorola ML-2499-HPA8-01 network antenna Omni-directional antenna N-type 8 dBi.

  • Antenna gain level (max)
    • ANT50-2000N network antenna Directional antenna 20 dBi:20 dBi
    • Motorola ML-2499-HPA8-01 network antenna Omni-directional antenna N-type 8 dBi:8 dBi
  • Frequency band
    • ANT50-2000N network antenna Directional antenna 20 dBi:5.15 - 5.875 GHz
    • Motorola ML-2499-HPA8-01 network antenna Omni-directional antenna N-type 8 dBi:2.4 - 2.5 GHz
  • Antenna type
    • ANT50-2000N network antenna Directional antenna 20 dBi:Directional antenna
    • Motorola ML-2499-HPA8-01 network antenna Omni-directional antenna N-type 8 dBi:Omni-directional antenna
  • Polarization
    • ANT50-2000N network antenna Directional antenna 20 dBi:Dual polarization
    • Motorola ML-2499-HPA8-01 network antenna Omni-directional antenna N-type 8 dBi:Vertical polarization
  • Weight
    • ANT50-2000N network antenna Directional antenna 20 dBi:1.32 kg
    • Motorola ML-2499-HPA8-01 network antenna Omni-directional antenna N-type 8 dBi:204 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of ANT50-2000N, ML-2499-HPA8-01
22 specifications
Performance2 differ
Antenna gain level (max)Differs20 dBi8 dBi
Frequency bandDiffers5.15 - 5.875 GHz2.4 - 2.5 GHz
ImpedanceKnown for one50 ΩUnknown — not stated by the source
Horizontal beam widthKnown for one10°Unknown — not stated by the source
Vertical beam widthKnown for one10°Unknown — not stated by the source
Horizontal beam width (2.4 GHz)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source360°
Vertical beam width (2.4 GHz)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source14°
Features2 differ
Antenna typeDiffersDirectional antennaOmni-directional antenna
PolarizationDiffersDual polarizationVertical polarization
Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR)Known for one2.0:1Unknown — not stated by the source
Product colourKnown for oneWhiteUnknown — not stated by the source
MountingKnown for oneWallUnknown — not stated by the source
Power handlingKnown for one6 WUnknown — not stated by the source
PurposeOutdoorOutdoor
Antenna connector typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceN-type
Connector genderKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMale
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for oneIP 67 ETSI EN 302 085 v1.1.2 TS1-TS3Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one-40 - 80 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one320 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one320 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one20 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers1.32 kg204 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More network antenna comparisons

All network antenna comparisons