Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

Fujitsu CELVIN NAS Servers Q700 vs Fujitsu ETERNUS DX DX60 Rack (2U)

10specifications compared
6differ
4identical
23known for one product only

Key differences

Storage drive interface
- CELVIN NAS Servers Q700:Serial ATA
- ETERNUS DX DX60 Rack (2U):Fibre Channel
Weight
- CELVIN NAS Servers Q700:1.36 kg
- ETERNUS DX DX60 Rack (2U):35 kg
Operating temperature (T-T)
- CELVIN NAS Servers Q700:0 - 40 °C
- ETERNUS DX DX60 Rack (2U):5 - 40 °C
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- CELVIN NAS Servers Q700:85 x 218.4 x 165.5 mm
- ETERNUS DX DX60 Rack (2U):483 x 650 x 88 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CELVIN NAS Servers Q700, DX60
33 specifications	A Fujitsu CELVIN NAS Servers Q700 View product	B Fujitsu ETERNUS DX DX60 Rack (2U) Model DX60 View product
Storage1 differ
Number of storage drives supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	24
Storage drive interfaceDiffers	Serial ATA	Fibre Channel
Storage drive sizeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.5"
HDD speedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7200 RPM
Maximum supported storage capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	24 TB
RAID levelsKnown for one	0, 1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Supported file systemsKnown for one	EXT3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Chassis typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Rack (2U)
Performanceidentical
Management protocolsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10/100/1000 Mbit/s
Web-based managementKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Softwareidentical
Bundled softwareKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ETERNUS SF Express
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	1.36 kg	35 kg
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	0 - 40 °C	5 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 - 80%
Other features3 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	Microsoft Windows XP Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Microsoft Windows Vista Microsoft Windows 7 Mac OS X Linux UNIX	- Windows Server 2003 & 2008; - Solaris 8, 9, 10; - RedHat Enterprise Linux Server & Advanced Platform; - HP-UX; - IBM AIX; - VMware vSphere & VMware Infrastructure; - Citrix XenServer
Data transfer rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4 Gbit/s
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	85 x 218.4 x 165.5 mm	483 x 650 x 88 mm
Fibre ChannelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Size (imperial)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	48.3 cm (19")
CertificationDiffers	CE, FCC Class A	UL60950-1, CSA60950-1, EN60950-1, IEC60950-1, GOST, FCC Part-15 Class A, ICES-003 Class A, EN55022 Class A, VCCI Class A, AS/NZS CISPR22 Class A, CNS13438(C6357) Class A, C-Tick, BSMI, EN 55024, CE, RoHS, WEEE
Power requirementsKnown for one	100 - 240 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Processoridentical
Processor frequencyKnown for one	1.2 GHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Memoryidentical
Internal memoryKnown for one	0.5 GB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Flash memoryKnown for one	16 MB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Networkidentical
Supported network protocolsKnown for one	TCP/IP, DHCP client, DHCP server, CIFS/SMB, AFP. NFS v3, HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, DDNS, NTP, Gigabit Jumbo Frame, Bonjour	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power supply unit (PSU) capacityKnown for one	60 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (sleep)Known for one	9 W	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More nas & storage servers comparisons

All nas & storage servers comparisons