Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

Fujitsu CELVIN NAS Servers Q700 vs Fujitsu ETERNUS DX DX60 Rack (2U)

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 4identical
  • 23known for one product only

Key differences

  • Storage drive interface
    • CELVIN NAS Servers Q700:Serial ATA
    • ETERNUS DX DX60 Rack (2U):Fibre Channel
  • Weight
    • CELVIN NAS Servers Q700:1.36 kg
    • ETERNUS DX DX60 Rack (2U):35 kg
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • CELVIN NAS Servers Q700:0 - 40 °C
    • ETERNUS DX DX60 Rack (2U):5 - 40 °C
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • CELVIN NAS Servers Q700:85 x 218.4 x 165.5 mm
    • ETERNUS DX DX60 Rack (2U):483 x 650 x 88 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of CELVIN NAS Servers Q700, DX60
33 specifications
Storage1 differ
Total installed storage capacity2 TB2 TB
Number of storage drives installed22
Number of storage drives supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source24
Storage drive capacity1 TB1 TB
Storage drive interfaceDiffersSerial ATAFibre Channel
Storage drive sizeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.5"
HDD speedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7200 RPM
Maximum supported storage capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source24 TB
RAID levelsKnown for one0, 1Unknown — not stated by the source
Supported file systemsKnown for oneEXT3Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Chassis typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRack (2U)
Performanceidentical
Management protocolsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10/100/1000 Mbit/s
Web-based managementKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Softwareidentical
Bundled softwareKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceETERNUS SF Express
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers1.36 kg35 kg
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 40 °C5 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 - 80%
Other features3 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffersMicrosoft Windows XP Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Microsoft Windows Vista Microsoft Windows 7 Mac OS X Linux UNIX- Windows Server 2003 & 2008; - Solaris 8, 9, 10; - RedHat Enterprise Linux Server & Advanced Platform; - HP-UX; - IBM AIX; - VMware vSphere & VMware Infrastructure; - Citrix XenServer
Data transfer rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4 Gbit/s
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs85 x 218.4 x 165.5 mm483 x 650 x 88 mm
Fibre ChannelKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Link/Act LEDYesYes
Size (imperial)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source48.3 cm (19")
CertificationDiffersCE, FCC Class AUL60950-1, CSA60950-1, EN60950-1, IEC60950-1, GOST, FCC Part-15 Class A, ICES-003 Class A, EN55022 Class A, VCCI Class A, AS/NZS CISPR22 Class A, CNS13438(C6357) Class A, C-Tick, BSMI, EN 55024, CE, RoHS, WEEE
Power requirementsKnown for one100 - 240 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Processoridentical
Processor frequencyKnown for one1.2 GHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Memoryidentical
Internal memoryKnown for one0.5 GBUnknown — not stated by the source
Flash memoryKnown for one16 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Networkidentical
Supported network protocolsKnown for oneTCP/IP, DHCP client, DHCP server, CIFS/SMB, AFP. NFS v3, HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, DDNS, NTP, Gigabit Jumbo Frame, BonjourUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one3Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power supply unit (PSU) capacityKnown for one60 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (sleep)Known for one9 WUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More nas & storage servers comparisons

All nas & storage servers comparisons