Product comparison · 2 monitors crt

Samsung SyncMaster 797MB vs Viewsonic E96f+SB 19" (18" Viewable) E²® Series CRT Monitor

10specifications compared
8differ
2identical
24known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- SyncMaster 797MB:43.2 cm (17")
- E96f+SB 19" (18" Viewable) E²® Series CRT Monitor:48.3 cm (19")
Type
- SyncMaster 797MB:DynaFlat
- E96f+SB 19" (18" Viewable) E²® Series CRT Monitor:CRT
Viewable size diagonal
- SyncMaster 797MB:40.6 cm
- E96f+SB 19" (18" Viewable) E²® Series CRT Monitor:26.4 cm
Horizontal scan range
- SyncMaster 797MB:30 - 96 kHz
- E96f+SB 19" (18" Viewable) E²® Series CRT Monitor:30 - 86 kHz
Certification
- SyncMaster 797MB:TCO'03, TÜV GS, CE
- E96f+SB 19" (18" Viewable) E²® Series CRT Monitor:CCC, MPR II, SASO, CB
Power consumption (typical)
- SyncMaster 797MB:80 W
- E96f+SB 19" (18" Viewable) E²® Series CRT Monitor:55 W
Weight
- SyncMaster 797MB:14.3 kg
- E96f+SB 19" (18" Viewable) E²® Series CRT Monitor:18 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of SyncMaster 797MB, E96f+SB 19" (18" Viewable) E²® Series CRT Monitor
34 specifications	A Samsung SyncMaster 797MB View product	B Viewsonic E96f+SB 19" (18" Viewable) E²® Series CRT Monitor View product
Display4 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	43.2 cm (17")	48.3 cm (19")
TypeDiffers	DynaFlat	CRT
Display resolutionKnown for one	1920 x 1440 pixels	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size diagonalDiffers	40.6 cm	26.4 cm
Vertical scan range	50 - 160 Hz	50 - 160 Hz
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	30 - 96 kHz	30 - 86 kHz
Monitor sync input signalKnown for one	Separate H/V, Composite	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum resolutionKnown for one	1920 x 1440 pixels	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pixel pitchKnown for one	0.2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Surface treatmentKnown for one	Multi-Layer Coating	Unknown — not stated by the source
Recommended resolutionKnown for one	1280x1024@85Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	35.2 cm
Features1 differ
Plug and Play	Yes	Yes
CertificationDiffers	TCO'03, TÜV GS, CE	CCC, MPR II, SASO, CB
Power2 differ
Power managementKnown for one	EPA/VESA DPMS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Differs	80 W	55 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	2 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsDiffers	AC 90-264VAC, 50/60Hz	AC 100 – 240V, 50/60Hz (+/-3Hz)
Management featuresidentical
User controlsKnown for one	OSD	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Dimensions (W x D x H) with standKnown for one	401 x 378 x 410 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers	14.3 kg	18 kg
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	465 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	424 mm
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	445 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	464 x 459 x 518 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	16.2 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
Electromagnetic emissionsKnown for one	MPR-II	Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Windows 2000/ME/XP	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mac compatibilityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Technical detailsidentical
Special featuresKnown for one	MagicBright 2 HighlightZone III	Unknown — not stated by the source
Video Dot RateKnown for one	250 MHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
I/O portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	15-pin mini D-sub
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 95%
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 40 °C

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitors crt comparisons

All monitors crt comparisons