Product comparison · 2 monitors crt

Samsung SyncMaster 795DF vs Samsung SyncMaster 997MB

13specifications compared
10differ
3identical
17known for one product only

Key differences

The Samsung SyncMaster 997MB has 20 W more power consumption (typical) than the Samsung SyncMaster 795DF (100 W vs 80 W). The Samsung SyncMaster 997MB has 3.9 kg more weight than the Samsung SyncMaster 795DF (18.2 kg vs 14.3 kg). The Samsung SyncMaster 997MB has 65 MHz more video Dot Rate than the Samsung SyncMaster 795DF (250 MHz vs 185 MHz). Display diagonal: 43.2 cm (17") on the Samsung SyncMaster 795DF, 48.3 cm (19") on the Samsung SyncMaster 997MB. Horizontal scan range: 30 - 85 kHz on the Samsung SyncMaster 795DF, 30 - 96 kHz on the Samsung SyncMaster 997MB.

Display diagonal
- SyncMaster 795DF:43.2 cm (17")
- SyncMaster 997MB:48.3 cm (19")
Horizontal scan range
- SyncMaster 795DF:30 - 85 kHz
- SyncMaster 997MB:30 - 96 kHz
Pixel pitch
- SyncMaster 795DF:0.2
- SyncMaster 997MB:0.20
Certification
- SyncMaster 795DF:TCO‘03, CE, ISO 9241/3,7,8
- SyncMaster 997MB:TCO'03
I/O ports
- SyncMaster 795DF:VGA (D-Sub)
- SyncMaster 997MB:15-pin D-Sub, 5 BNC
Power management
- SyncMaster 795DF:EPA, VESA DPMS, Energy 2000
- SyncMaster 997MB:EPA/VESA DPMS
Power consumption (typical)
- SyncMaster 795DF:80 W
- SyncMaster 997MB:100 W
Power requirements
- SyncMaster 795DF:110-240V; 50/60Hz
- SyncMaster 997MB:AC 90-264VAC, 50/60Hz

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of SyncMaster 795DF, SyncMaster 997MB
30 specifications	A Samsung SyncMaster 795DF View product	B Samsung SyncMaster 997MB View product
Display3 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	43.2 cm (17")	48.3 cm (19")
TypeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Dyna Flat
Display resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1920 x 1440 pixels
Vertical scan range	50 - 160 Hz	50 - 160 Hz
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	30 - 85 kHz	30 - 96 kHz
Monitor sync input signalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Separate H/V, Composite
Maximum resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1920 x 1440 pixels
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.2	0.20
Surface treatmentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Multi-Layer Coating
Recommended resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1280x1024 @85Hz; 1600x1200 @75Hz
Viewable size diagonalKnown for one	40.6 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one	325 x 244 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display resolution at frequencyKnown for one	1600x1200 @ 68 Hz 1280x1024 @ 79 Hz 1152x864 @ 93 Hz 1024x768 @ 104 Hz 800x600 @ 131 Hz 640x480 @ 160 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Features1 differ
Plug and Play	Yes	Yes
CertificationDiffers	TCO‘03, CE, ISO 9241/3,7,8	TCO'03
Ports & interfaces1 differ
I/O portsDiffers	VGA (D-Sub)	15-pin D-Sub, 5 BNC
Power3 differ
Power managementDiffers	EPA, VESA DPMS, Energy 2000	EPA/VESA DPMS
Power consumption (typical)Differs	80 W	100 W
Power consumption (standby)	2 W	2 W
Power requirementsDiffers	110-240V; 50/60Hz	AC 90-264VAC, 50/60Hz
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Dimensions (W x D x H) with standKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	445 x 457.5 x 416 mm
WeightDiffers	14.3 kg	18.2 kg
DepthKnown for one	410 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	378 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WidthKnown for one	401 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	557 x 607 x 507 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	21.5 kg
System requirementsidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Windows 2000/ME/XP
Technical details1 differ
Special featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	MagicBright Highlight Zone III
Video Dot RateDiffers	185 MHz	250 MHz

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitors crt comparisons

All monitors crt comparisons