Product comparison · 2 monitors crt

Samsung Samtron 78E vs Samsung SyncMaster 997MB

12specifications compared
9differ
3identical
16known for one product only

Key differences

The Samsung Samtron 78E has 0.03 more pixel pitch than the Samsung SyncMaster 997MB (0.23 vs 0.20). The Samsung SyncMaster 997MB has 20 W more power consumption (typical) than the Samsung Samtron 78E (100 W vs 80 W). The Samsung SyncMaster 997MB has 4.4 kg more weight than the Samsung Samtron 78E (18.2 kg vs 13.8 kg). Display diagonal: 43.2 cm (17") on the Samsung Samtron 78E, 48.3 cm (19") on the Samsung SyncMaster 997MB. Horizontal scan range: 30 - 70 kHz on the Samsung Samtron 78E, 30 - 96 kHz on the Samsung SyncMaster 997MB.

Display diagonal
- Samtron 78E:43.2 cm (17")
- SyncMaster 997MB:48.3 cm (19")
Horizontal scan range
- Samtron 78E:30 - 70 kHz
- SyncMaster 997MB:30 - 96 kHz
Pixel pitch
- Samtron 78E:0.23
- SyncMaster 997MB:0.20
Power management
- Samtron 78E:EPA, VESA DPMS
- SyncMaster 997MB:EPA/VESA DPMS
Power consumption (typical)
- Samtron 78E:80 W
- SyncMaster 997MB:100 W
Power requirements
- Samtron 78E:110-240V; 50/60Hz
- SyncMaster 997MB:AC 90-264VAC, 50/60Hz
Weight
- Samtron 78E:13.8 kg
- SyncMaster 997MB:18.2 kg
Video Dot Rate
- Samtron 78E:110 MHz
- SyncMaster 997MB:250 MHz

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Samtron 78E, SyncMaster 997MB
28 specifications	A Samsung Samtron 78E View product	B Samsung SyncMaster 997MB View product
Display3 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	43.2 cm (17")	48.3 cm (19")
TypeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Dyna Flat
Display resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1920 x 1440 pixels
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	30 - 70 kHz	30 - 96 kHz
Monitor sync input signalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Separate H/V, Composite
Maximum resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1920 x 1440 pixels
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.23	0.20
Surface treatmentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Multi-Layer Coating
Recommended resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1280x1024 @85Hz; 1600x1200 @75Hz
Viewable size diagonalKnown for one	40.6 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one	325 x 244 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display resolution at frequencyKnown for one	1280x1024 @65Hz 1152x864 @77Hz 1024x768 @86Hz 800x600 @109Hz 640x480 @134Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Features1 differ
CertificationDiffers	TCO'03, CE, TÜV GS, ISO 9241/3,7,8	TCO'03
Ports & interfacesidentical
I/O portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	15-pin D-Sub, 5 BNC
Power3 differ
Power managementDiffers	EPA, VESA DPMS	EPA/VESA DPMS
Power consumption (typical)Differs	80 W	100 W
Power requirementsDiffers	110-240V; 50/60Hz	AC 90-264VAC, 50/60Hz
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Dimensions (W x D x H) with standKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	445 x 457.5 x 416 mm
WeightDiffers	13.8 kg	18.2 kg
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	401 x 410 x 378 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	557 x 607 x 507 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	21.5 kg
System requirementsidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Windows 2000/ME/XP
Technical details1 differ
Special featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	MagicBright Highlight Zone III
Video Dot RateDiffers	110 MHz	250 MHz

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitors crt comparisons

All monitors crt comparisons