Product comparison · 2 monitors crt

Samsung Samtron 78E vs Samsung SyncMaster 1100MB

13specifications compared
10differ
3identical
16known for one product only

Key differences

The Samsung Samtron 78E has 0.03 more pixel pitch than the Samsung SyncMaster 1100MB (0.23 vs 0.20). The Samsung SyncMaster 1100MB has 50 W more power consumption (typical) than the Samsung Samtron 78E (130 W vs 80 W). The Samsung SyncMaster 1100MB has 12.3 kg more weight than the Samsung Samtron 78E (26.1 kg vs 13.8 kg). Display diagonal: 43.2 cm (17") on the Samsung Samtron 78E, 53.3 cm (21") on the Samsung SyncMaster 1100MB. Horizontal scan range: 30 - 70 kHz on the Samsung Samtron 78E, 30 - 130 kHz on the Samsung SyncMaster 1100MB.

Display diagonal
- Samtron 78E:43.2 cm (17")
- SyncMaster 1100MB:53.3 cm (21")
Horizontal scan range
- Samtron 78E:30 - 70 kHz
- SyncMaster 1100MB:30 - 130 kHz
Display viewable area (HxV)
- Samtron 78E:325 x 244 mm
- SyncMaster 1100MB:393 x 295 mm
Pixel pitch
- Samtron 78E:0.23
- SyncMaster 1100MB:0.20
Power management
- Samtron 78E:EPA, VESA DPMS
- SyncMaster 1100MB:EPA/Energy2000/VESA DPMS
Power consumption (typical)
- Samtron 78E:80 W
- SyncMaster 1100MB:130 W
Power requirements
- Samtron 78E:110-240V; 50/60Hz
- SyncMaster 1100MB:100 - 240V, 50/60Hz
Weight
- Samtron 78E:13.8 kg
- SyncMaster 1100MB:26.1 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Samtron 78E, SyncMaster 1100MB
29 specifications	A Samsung Samtron 78E View product	B Samsung SyncMaster 1100MB View product
Display4 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	43.2 cm (17")	53.3 cm (21")
Display resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2048 x 1536 pixels
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	30 - 70 kHz	30 - 130 kHz
Maximum resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2048 x 1536 pixels
Display viewable area (HxV)Differs	325 x 244 mm	393 x 295 mm
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.23	0.20
Surface treatmentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Multi-Layer Coating
Recommended resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1280x1024 @118Hz; 1600x1200 @102Hz
Viewable size diagonalKnown for one	40.6 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display resolution at frequencyKnown for one	1280x1024 @65Hz 1152x864 @77Hz 1024x768 @86Hz 800x600 @109Hz 640x480 @134Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Features1 differ
CertificationDiffers	TCO'03, CE, TÜV GS, ISO 9241/3,7,8	TCO'99
Ports & interfacesidentical
I/O portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1x D-Sub 15-pin 5x BNC
Power3 differ
Power managementDiffers	EPA, VESA DPMS	EPA/Energy2000/VESA DPMS
Power consumption (typical)Differs	80 W	130 W
Power requirementsDiffers	110-240V; 50/60Hz	100 - 240V, 50/60Hz
Management featuresidentical
User controlsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	OSD
Weight & dimensions1 differ
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	508 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	492 mm
WeightDiffers	13.8 kg	26.1 kg
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	504 mm
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	401 x 410 x 378 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	634 x 642 x 625 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30.5 kg
System requirementsidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Windows 98/2000/ME/XP
Technical details1 differ
Special featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	MagicBright Highlight Zone
Video Dot RateDiffers	110 MHz	360 MHz

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitors crt comparisons

All monitors crt comparisons