Product comparison · 2 monitors crt

Samsung 794V monitor CRT vs Samsung SyncMaster 797MB

12specifications compared
9differ
3identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

The Samsung SyncMaster 797MB has 10 W more power consumption (typical) than the Samsung 794V monitor CRT (80 W vs 70 W). The Samsung SyncMaster 797MB has 1 W more power consumption (standby) than the Samsung 794V monitor CRT (2 W vs 1 W). Type: CDT on the Samsung 794V monitor CRT, DynaFlat on the Samsung SyncMaster 797MB. Display resolution: 1024 x 768 pixels on the Samsung 794V monitor CRT, 1920 x 1440 pixels on the Samsung SyncMaster 797MB. Horizontal scan range: 30 - 70 kHz on the Samsung 794V monitor CRT, 30 - 96 kHz on the Samsung SyncMaster 797MB.

Type
- 794V monitor CRT:CDT
- SyncMaster 797MB:DynaFlat
Display resolution
- 794V monitor CRT:1024 x 768 pixels
- SyncMaster 797MB:1920 x 1440 pixels
Horizontal scan range
- 794V monitor CRT:30 - 70 kHz
- SyncMaster 797MB:30 - 96 kHz
Maximum resolution
- 794V monitor CRT:1280 x 1024 pixels
- SyncMaster 797MB:1920 x 1440 pixels
Pixel pitch
- 794V monitor CRT:0.230 x 0.230 mm
- SyncMaster 797MB:0.2
Power consumption (typical)
- 794V monitor CRT:70 W
- SyncMaster 797MB:80 W
Power consumption (standby)
- 794V monitor CRT:1 W
- SyncMaster 797MB:2 W
Power requirements
- 794V monitor CRT:CA90~264VCA, 50/60 Hz
- SyncMaster 797MB:AC 90-264VAC, 50/60Hz

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 794V, SyncMaster 797MB
33 specifications	A Samsung 794V monitor CRT Model 794V View product	B Samsung SyncMaster 797MB View product
Display5 differ
TypeDiffers	CDT	DynaFlat
Display resolutionDiffers	1024 x 768 pixels	1920 x 1440 pixels
Viewable size diagonalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	40.6 cm
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	30 - 70 kHz	30 - 96 kHz
Monitor sync input signalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Separate H/V, Composite
Maximum resolutionDiffers	1280 x 1024 pixels	1920 x 1440 pixels
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.230 x 0.230 mm	0.2
Surface treatmentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Multi-Layer Coating
Recommended resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1280x1024@85Hz
Featuresidentical
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	TCO'03, TÜV GS, CE
ErgonomicsKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Product colourKnown for one	Ivory	Unknown — not stated by the source
Video inKnown for one	analog RGB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power3 differ
Power managementKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	EPA/VESA DPMS
Power consumption (typical)Differs	70 W	80 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs	1 W	2 W
Power requirementsDiffers	CA90~264VCA, 50/60 Hz	AC 90-264VAC, 50/60Hz
Management featuresidentical
User controlsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	OSD
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Dimensions (W x D x H) with standDiffers	401 x 410 x 378 mm	401 x 378 x 410 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	14.3 kg
Set weightKnown for one	12.7 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	464 x 459 x 518 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16.2 kg
Package depthKnown for one	498 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	459 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package widthKnown for one	464 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
Electromagnetic emissionsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	MPR-II
System requirementsidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Windows 2000/ME/XP
Technical detailsidentical
Special featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	MagicBright 2 HighlightZone III
Video Dot RateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	250 MHz

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitors crt comparisons

All monitors crt comparisons