Product comparison · 2 monitors crt

Philips 19" (18.0" VIS) XSD™ monitor vs Samsung 793S Ivory Retail

11specifications compared
10differ
1identical
15known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips 19" (18.0" VIS) XSD™ monitor has 5.4 cm more viewable size diagonal than the Samsung 793S Ivory Retail (46 cm vs 40.6 cm). The Philips 19" (18.0" VIS) XSD™ monitor has 3 W more power consumption (typical) than the Samsung 793S Ivory Retail (83 W vs 80 W). The Samsung 793S Ivory Retail has 1 W more power consumption (standby) than the Philips 19" (18.0" VIS) XSD™ monitor (3 W vs 2 W). Display diagonal: 48.3 cm (19") on the Philips 19" (18.0" VIS) XSD™ monitor, 43.2 cm (17") on the Samsung 793S Ivory Retail. Display resolution: 1920 x 1440 pixels on the Philips 19" (18.0" VIS) XSD™ monitor, 1280 x 1024 pixels on the Samsung 793S Ivory Retail.

Display diagonal
- 19" (18.0" VIS) XSD™ monitor:48.3 cm (19")
- 793S Ivory Retail:43.2 cm (17")
Display resolution
- 19" (18.0" VIS) XSD™ monitor:1920 x 1440 pixels
- 793S Ivory Retail:1280 x 1024 pixels
Viewable size diagonal
- 19" (18.0" VIS) XSD™ monitor:46 cm
- 793S Ivory Retail:40.6 cm
Horizontal scan range
- 19" (18.0" VIS) XSD™ monitor:30 - 92 kHz
- 793S Ivory Retail:30 - 70 kHz
Pixel pitch
- 19" (18.0" VIS) XSD™ monitor:0.23 x 0.27 mm
- 793S Ivory Retail:0.23
Recommended resolution
- 19" (18.0" VIS) XSD™ monitor:1280 x 1024
- 793S Ivory Retail:1024 x 768
Power consumption (typical)
- 19" (18.0" VIS) XSD™ monitor:83 W
- 793S Ivory Retail:80 W
Power consumption (standby)
- 19" (18.0" VIS) XSD™ monitor:2 W
- 793S Ivory Retail:3 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 19" (18.0" VIS) XSD™ monitor, 793S Ivory Retail
26 specifications	A Philips 19" (18.0" VIS) XSD™ monitor View product	B Samsung 793S Ivory Retail View product
Display6 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	48.3 cm (19")	43.2 cm (17")
Display resolutionDiffers	1920 x 1440 pixels	1280 x 1024 pixels
Viewable size diagonalDiffers	46 cm	40.6 cm
Vertical scan range	50 - 160 Hz	50 - 160 Hz
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	30 - 92 kHz	30 - 70 kHz
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.23 x 0.27 mm	0.23
Recommended resolutionDiffers	1280 x 1024	1024 x 768
Monitor sync input signalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Separate H/V
Maximum resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1280 x 1024 pixels
Features1 differ
CertificationDiffers	- TCO ‘99 - MPR-II Low Emission - TÜV/GS,TÜV-Ergo,TÜV/9241-3 - FCC-B, UL, CSA, DHHS - SEMKO, Poland-B sign, C-Tick - CE, BCIQ, PSB - NUTEK, Energy Star	MPR 2
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ports & interfacesidentical
I/O portsKnown for one	15-pin	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	83 W	80 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs	2 W	3 W
Power requirementsKnown for one	90 - 264 VAC, 50/60Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	5 - 95%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-25 - 65 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	32 - 104 °F	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
DepthKnown for one	441 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dimensions (W x D x H) with standKnown for one	440 x 447 x 441 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	399 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers	19.4 kg	13.8 kg
WidthKnown for one	440 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	401 x 378 x 409 mm
System requirementsidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Microsoft Windows 95/98/ME & 2000/NT/XP	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	465 x 460 x 508 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitors crt comparisons

All monitors crt comparisons