Product comparison · 2 monitors crt

Philips 109E50 19" FST .25 92kHz vs Samsung SM957MB 19"

13specifications compared
11differ
2identical
12known for one product only

Key differences

Display resolution
- 109E50 19" FST .25 92kHz:1280 x 1024 pixels
- SM957MB 19":1920 x 1440 pixels
Vertical scan range
- 109E50 19" FST .25 92kHz:50 - 160 Hz
- SM957MB 19":160
Horizontal scan range
- 109E50 19" FST .25 92kHz:30 - 92 kHz
- SM957MB 19":96
Display viewable area (HxV)
- 109E50 19" FST .25 92kHz:360 x 270 mm
- SM957MB 19":352 x 264 mm
Pixel pitch
- 109E50 19" FST .25 92kHz:0.25 x 0.21 mm
- SM957MB 19":0.20
Video in
- 109E50 19" FST .25 92kHz:RGB
- SM957MB 19":15pin D-Sub+BNC Option
Monitor maximum power consumption
- 109E50 19" FST .25 92kHz:65 W
- SM957MB 19":110 W
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- 109E50 19" FST .25 92kHz:440 x 437 x 443 mm
- SM957MB 19":440 x 460 x 461 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 109E50 19" FST .25 92kHz, SM957MB 19"
25 specifications	A Philips 109E50 19" FST .25 92kHz View product	B Samsung SM957MB 19"View product
Display5 differ
Display resolutionDiffers	1280 x 1024 pixels	1920 x 1440 pixels
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	26.4 cm
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	35.2 cm
Vertical scan rangeDiffers	50 - 160 Hz	160
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	30 - 92 kHz	96
Display viewable area (HxV)Differs	360 x 270 mm	352 x 264 mm
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.25 x 0.21 mm	0.20
DisplayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CRT
Surface treatmentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Multi-Layer Coating
Recommended resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1280x1024 @85Hz, 1600x1200 @75Hz
TypeKnown for one	Display / CRT Shadow mask	Unknown — not stated by the source
Features2 differ
Audio systemKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Video inDiffers	RGB	15pin D-Sub+BNC Option
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
CertificationDiffers	TCO '03, FCC Class B certified, CE, MPR II, CSA, UL, TUV GS, C-Tick, ISO 9241-3, BCIQ, DDC-2B, DHHS, EPA Energy Star, NUTEK, SEMKO	Safety & X-ray: UL, CSA, TUV, CB, NEMKO, Korea EK, CCIB, PSB, NOM, GOST, CDRH, IRAM EMC: FCC, CE, VCCI, C-tick, BSMI,Mic, ICES Enviromental/ Ergonomics: TUV GS, MPR II, TCO99(option) Windows Logo: Windows98/2000/ ME/XP
Power1 differ
Monitor maximum power consumptionDiffers	65 W	110 W
Management features1 differ
User controlsDiffers	Brightness, contrast, H/V moire, H/V position, H/V size, trapezoid, degauss, parallelogram, pincushion, pin balance, zoom	Brightness, Contrast, Position, Size, Zoom, Parallelogram, Rotation, incushion, Trapezoid, Pinbalance, Side Pin Corner, Pin balance Corner, Color1/2, sRGB,Clear Moire, Linearity, Focus, Convergence, Degauss, Recall, Video Input level, Sync. Input type, D-sub/BNC, Display Timing, Menu Position, Menu
Weight & dimensions2 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	440 x 437 x 443 mm	440 x 460 x 461 mm
WeightDiffers	17.8 kg	21 kg
Ports & interfacesidentical
I/O portsKnown for one	1 x VGA - 15 pin HD D-Sub (HD-15)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	5 - 95%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	0 - 40 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Compatible productsKnown for one	PC, Mac	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitors crt comparisons

All monitors crt comparisons